Some people believe that traveling to and living in numerous places increases one’s ability to relate and connect to other people. Others believe that this ability is better cultivated by living in one place and developing a deep understanding of that community.
The issue of whether one should travel and live in numerous places or live in one place in order to increase their ability to relate and connect to other people is a contentious one. While each side has its strengths and weaknesses, I believe that traveling numerous sites better suits the purpose of developing one’s effective social skills because it provides opportunities to interact with multifarious types of people. Furthermore, it trains individuals for one of the most vital parts of human relationships, and all these benefits are exclusive to those who live in various locations.
First and foremost, you are able to interact with various types of people through traveling. There are diverse kinds of people in the world, different ethnic groups have distinct but occasionally shared cultures. Without first being exposed to the culture, it becomes fairly challenging to connect to those with the culture. In other words, understanding one culture through traveling enables individuals to easily connect to a group of people who have a similar culture. For example, many countries in Asia share similar values, such as respecting elders. Once you understand their basic values, it becomes much easier to understand their mindset and behaviors. If you live in a slam and interact with the people who are not wealthy, it becomes easier for you to connect to relatively poor people that are everywhere in the world. Therefore, traveling and interacting with multifarious types of people enhances one’s ability to relate with others.
Secondly, switching the environment frequently trains you for one of the most vital parts of human interaction. People tend to be biased towards the other by the first interaction with the person. Depending on the circumstances, it is entirely possible that one becomes unwilling to meet you for the second time. In that case, you will less likely to be able to recover the relationship. Therefore, how one behaves to others in the first place is a vital part of smooth and effective relationships. If you stay within one community, the chances that others have known about you somehow are fairly high especially if the community is high. Therefore, it is difficult to improve the skill needed for the first time interaction. On the other hand, traveling multiple locations requires you to interact with the people who have never seen you. Thus, traveling and relocating often boost one’s ability to relate to others effectively.
Finally, some may argue that a deep relationship is only attainable from a long relationship, therefore it is not possible if one travels away from a community. However, this point is flawed since there is the Internet available for anyone to connect from distant locations. Once you become close to others in a community, it is totally doable to get in touch with the people even after once you leave the community and growing deep relationships until you return to the community one day. Therefore, the benefit of the in-person relationship is not exclusive to the ones who stay in the location in this time period. However, on the other hand, the amount of knowledge about other cultures one can attain from the Internet is still limited because, most of the time time, the Internet provides you with the information that you searched for but hardly expose you to the diversity. Hence, traveling multiple locations provide exclusive benefits in order to connect to others.
In sum, traveling numerous sites better suits the purpose of developing one’s ability to relate with others because it provides the opportunities to interact with multifarious types of people, it trains individuals for one of the vital part of human relationships, and all these benefits are exclusive to those who live in various locations.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 287, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'connecting'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'challenge' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: connecting
... culture, it becomes fairly challenging to connect to those with the culture. In other wor...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 762, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: time
...t is still limited because, most of the time time, the Internet provides you with the inf...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, furthermore, hence, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, still, therefore, thus, while, for example, such as, in other words, in the first place, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 19.5258426966 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 12.4196629213 32% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 14.8657303371 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.3162921348 115% => OK
Pronoun: 47.0 33.0505617978 142% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 102.0 58.6224719101 174% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 12.9106741573 46% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 3185.0 2235.4752809 142% => OK
No of words: 619.0 442.535393258 140% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.14539579968 5.05705443957 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.98795655647 4.55969084622 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82932295179 2.79657885939 101% => OK
Unique words: 259.0 215.323595506 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.418416801292 0.4932671777 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 1039.5 704.065955056 148% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 6.24550561798 192% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 27.0 20.2370786517 133% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 61.8140935981 60.3974514979 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.962962963 118.986275619 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.9259259259 23.4991977007 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.92592592593 5.21951772744 133% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 20.0 10.2758426966 195% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.375682409422 0.243740707755 154% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.110412234123 0.0831039109588 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.112707373491 0.0758088955206 149% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.251849213221 0.150359130593 167% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.105455620163 0.0667264976115 158% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 14.1392134831 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 48.8420337079 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 12.1743820225 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.89 12.1639044944 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.02 8.38706741573 96% => OK
difficult_words: 129.0 100.480337079 128% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.8971910112 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.7820224719 119% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.