Undoubtedly, many evidences prove more earning of the celebities than the politicians. While some people are still of negative view. I will discuss both advantages and disadvantages with the countries development.
There are a plethora of reasons for famous personalities earning and devoting more money than the leaders. As the visibility of audience has increased globally, more and more events are been taking place world wide. Many rich companies are coming forward for hiring a professionals like sport men, actor etc, for advertisement. Before launching a new product, a personality is called for promotion, in return larger chunk of money is earned and some proportion is given in the form of taxes to the government for countries development whereas the money earned by a leader is not taxable under the law. To sustain in future, the Hot star offer much of the money as donation for a noble cause while the political party devote money to only show there personal objective.
Moreover, famous people earn money for their fame and personalties but leaders get most of their income by corruption mode and illegal means only. If the actor's have more money, they will use it for a noble cause but the politicians will only show their power and interfere in country's decision making. Many sincere leaders, due to shorage of money are forced to move towards dishonest means of earning income.
In hindsight, famous personality earnings are more favorable than the political person. They can improve the economic development of our country but authority only forces a dedicated person with short of money to either quit or move toward illegal means of earning money.
- Euthanasia or mercy killing has been a controversial issue for many years Although many people are strongly against such a practice there is a growing demand to have it legalized How far do you agree with euthanasia is being made legal 66
- Nowadays celebrities earn more money than politicians What are the reasons for this Is it a positive or negative development 78
- More and more people wear fashionable clothes Is this positive or negative development 73
- In Britain when someone gets old they often go to live in a home with other old people where there are nurses to look after them Sometimes the government has to pay for this care Who do you think should pay for this care the government or the family Give 61
- Successful sports professionals can earn a great deal more money than people in other important professions Some people think this is fully justified while others think it is unfair Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 85
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 88, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...of the celebities than the politicians. While some people are still of negative view....
^^^^^
Line 1, column 192, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'countries'' or 'country's'?
Suggestion: countries'; country's
...h advantages and disadvantages with the countries development. There are a plethora of...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 205, Rule ID: EN_COMPOUNDS
Message: This word is normally spelled as one.
Suggestion: worldwide
...e and more events are been taking place world wide. Many rich companies are coming forward...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 205, Rule ID: WORLD_WIDE[1]
Message: Did you mean 'worldwide'?
Suggestion: worldwide
...e and more events are been taking place world wide. Many rich companies are coming forward...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 360, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...isement. Before launching a new product, a personality is called for promotion, i...
^^
Line 3, column 615, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...s not taxable under the law. To sustain in future, the Hot star offer much of the money a...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, moreover, so, still, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 7.30460921844 0% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 8.0 24.0651302605 33% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1406.0 1615.20841683 87% => OK
No of words: 274.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.13138686131 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0685311056 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73009289476 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.587591240876 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 459.0 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.2154561913 49.4020404114 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.153846154 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0769230769 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.38461538462 7.06120827912 48% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.01903807615 120% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.324400302663 0.244688304435 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.118796224375 0.084324248473 141% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0747880232383 0.0667982634062 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.189588217498 0.151304729494 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0600451630692 0.056905535591 106% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.47 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.17 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 78.4519038076 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.