The charts show the reasons why undergraduates and postgraduates choose to go to Parker University Describe the difference and compare them if possible

Essay topics:

The charts show the reasons why undergraduates and postgraduates choose to go to Parker University. Describe the difference and compare them if possible

A glance at the provided reveals the striking similarities between undergraduates and postgraduates wanted to go to Parker university.

It is clear from the charts that the percentage of reputation of university was highest in both of these graduates . Both of them less chose location, other. Futhermore the percentage of personal recommodation in postgraduates and accommodation in undergraduates.

There were three reasons which postgraduates decided study in Parker university more than undergraduates. While 42% postgraduates related reputation , the number of undergraduates were lower (35%).When it comes to cost, the proportion of postgraduates was 32% compared to 24% of the other graduates.Meanwhile, the common reasons for both graduates ( availability of accommodation) was nearly equally popular with 7%(undergraduates ) and 8%(postgraduates).

On the other hand, by contrast, the figures for location and other in both of graduates showed difference of about 2%. THese reasons achieved a same proportions (6%) in postgraduates whereas undergraduates accounted 8% for choices

Votes
Average: 6.1 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2020-05-01 An ly 61 view

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 10, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
A glance at the provided reveals the striking sim...
^^
Line 3, column 116, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...y was highest in both of these graduates . Both of them less chose location, other...
^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...and accommodation in undergraduates. There were three reasons which postgradu...
^^
Line 5, column 151, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...ile 42% postgraduates related reputation , the number of undergraduates were lower...
^^
Line 5, column 198, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: When
...number of undergraduates were lower 35%.When it comes to cost, the proportion of pos...
^^^^
Line 5, column 300, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Meanwhile
... compared to 24% of the other graduates.Meanwhile, the common reasons for both graduates ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 348, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e, the common reasons for both graduates availability of accommodation was nearly...
^^
Line 5, column 428, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ly equally popular with 7%undergraduates and 8%postgraduates. On the other ...
^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...undergraduates and 8%postgraduates. On the other hand, by contrast, the figu...
^^^
Line 7, column 232, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... undergraduates accounted 8% for choices
^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, whereas, while, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 3.97073170732 227% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 934.0 965.302439024 97% => OK
No of words: 154.0 196.424390244 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.06493506494 4.92477711251 123% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.52273666998 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.9450740763 2.65546596893 149% => OK
Unique words: 95.0 106.607317073 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.616883116883 0.547539520022 113% => OK
syllable_count: 286.2 283.868780488 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.45097560976 131% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 82.5922779381 43.030603864 192% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.75 112.824112599 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.25 22.9334400587 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.125 5.23603664747 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 10.0 1.69756097561 589% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.281367250613 0.215688989381 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.110942121964 0.103423049105 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0466142979662 0.0843802449381 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.156359763662 0.15604864568 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0337119993521 0.0819641961636 41% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.7 13.2329268293 126% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 26.81 61.2550243902 44% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.51609756098 200% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.3012195122 138% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.87 11.4140731707 157% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.19 8.06136585366 114% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
More content wanted.

Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.