The given statement proposes that imagination is regarded more important than knowledge in most academic environments and occupations. Although, this is a generalized statement and may not apply to niche fields, it should hold true in most areas.
As a known fact, knowledge can be obtained very easily, especially in today's electronic era. Obtaining knowledge is indeed arduous, provided one has to cover a field in depth. However, it is not impossible and is mostly mechanical in nature. Procuring knowledge is, in fact, a task able to any layman. It does not imbibe higher thinking qualities, which are imperative to be had in academics and other professions. Contrary to this is the application of imagination. People who can imagine are regarded as very intelligent. In fact, imagination leads to knowledge. All historical discoveries and inventions, which we study today, have been possible because their inventors imagined a new phenomena to exist. Thus, people who can imagine, depict a high value of abstract thinking and are regarded more intelligent and important.
A suitable analogy to this view can be found in the field of academic publishing. Review papers summarize the development of a field since its inception. As their timeline can span from decades to centuries, a lot of information has to be summarized. The authors incessantly work for months to achieve this. Yet, review papers are not of significant importance in comparison to research papers. Research papers are brief. The quantity seems less, but they summarize an inference completely unknown to the whole world. This is possible because scientists imagine a hypothesis and carry out research to prove it. Such work is novel and of high quality. The findings they summarize are learned in the form of knowledge by others. Hence, imaginative works are much more important than those based on knowledge.
A similar phenomena is observed in other fields. William Harvey imagined the body to be similar to a water pumping station. He inferred that blood is transported in the body via a plumbing system. His subsequent experiments described the circulatory system. His imaginative skills laid the foundation for modern medicine. Such a feat could not have been achieved had Harvey studied the literature of that day to gain knowledge.
Hence, wherever possible, imagination is much more important than knowledge. It may not hold true everywhere, but imagination should be preferred than obtaining knowledge.
- In surveys Mason City residents rank water sports (swimming, boating, and fishing) among their favorite recreational activities. The Mason River flowing through the city is rarely used for these pursuits, however, and the city park department devotes litt 75
- A pet food company recalled 4 million pounds of pet food in response to complaints that pets that had consumed the food experienced vomiting, lethargy, and other signs of illness. After the recall, the pet food company tested samples from the recalled foo 50
- All too often, companies hire outside consultants to suggest ways for the company to operate more efficiently. If companies were to spend more time listening to their own employees, such consultants would be unnecessary. 80
- 1.Woven baskets characterized by a particular distinctive pattern have previously been found only in the immediate vicinity of the prehistoric village of Palea and therefore were believed to have been made only by the Palean people. Recently, however, arc 62
- Many lives might be saved if inoculations against cow flu were routinely administered to all people in areas in which the disease is detected.However since there is a small possibility that a person will die as a result of the inoculations,we cannot permi 30
Simply put: WOW! But I
Simply put: WOW!
But I suppose you can do much better with the introduction paragraph - not just some dry phrases. What I mean is, I got involved in the writing only in the middle of it, not the beginning. And according to all the recommendation papers on writing essays, you should catch the readers attention with the first sentence.
But again, great essay. Please, kindly look at mine.)
I wrote this for an ETS GRE
I wrote this for an ETS GRE Scoreitnow test and it gave me a 4.0
That means this is about average. That's disappointing.
Thanks for the insights into opening an essay stronger. I'll definitely work on it.
Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 5.0 out of 6
Category: Very Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 31 15
No. of Words: 395 350
No. of Characters: 2036 1500
No. of Different Words: 214 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.458 4.7
Average Word Length: 5.154 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.9 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 152 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 124 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 103 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 72 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 12.742 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 4.318 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.29 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.23 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.415 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.062 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 5 5