Advertisements have long been marketing tools in human society for some time. While, to some extent, advertising encourages people to buy production, others believe that ads will be useless if goods simply reach consumers' needs. I firmly believe that the former viewpoint can be justified and will further examine both sides in the following paragraphs.
It is widely accepted that people purchase goods because they know what they need, and their perception describes specific requirements for each product. It is undoubtedly true because we buy bread, noodles or other kinds of food only according to our feelings or diet habits. Another indicator is that rather than manipulated by various advertisements, consumers also consider their income. Despite persuasive advertising, people will never buy a luxurious vehicle like Mercedes Bens if they have an impoverished income. Selected by consumers, products just simply fulfill consumers' needs.
Admittedly, advertising has exerted the effects of disseminating commercial information on each product. Surrounded by various advertising, people might make the correct choice of buying a practical product, which means that advertisements make the products much easier and faster to be accessed by consumers across the world. Another reason for this phenomenon is that advertising undoubtedly plays a crucial role in product promotion. With those seductive advertisements, consumers are encouraged to buy the latest products even though their original ones are still perfectly useful.
In conclusion, I believe that advertising does have crucial functions in human society. It inevitably exerts the marketing effects, including product information dissemination and product promotion.
- People living in large cities face several problems What are these problems Should governments encourage people to move to smaller town 89
- The information below gives details about the household income and spending on food and clothes by an avarage family in a UK city in 2010 and 2013 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison where relevant 78
- The bar chart shows different types of household waste in a city between 1992 and 2002 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- Some people think that the government should ban dangerous sports but others think that people should have the freedom to do whatever sport activities they choose Discuss both views and give your opinion 89
- In some countries it is illegal to reject people applying for jobs because of their ages Is it a positive or negative development 89
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, so, still, while, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 22.0 41.998997996 52% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1489.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 253.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.88537549407 5.12529762239 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98822939669 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06861952922 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 176.041082164 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.640316205534 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 458.1 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.9724111152 49.4020404114 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.357142857 106.682146367 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0714285714 20.7667163134 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.92857142857 7.06120827912 41% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.281149239979 0.244688304435 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0848996197308 0.084324248473 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0525443434096 0.0667982634062 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.148975036464 0.151304729494 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0553746477599 0.056905535591 97% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.0946893788 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.28 50.2224549098 72% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.59 12.4159519038 134% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.77 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 78.4519038076 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, so, still, while, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 22.0 41.998997996 52% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1489.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 253.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.88537549407 5.12529762239 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98822939669 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06861952922 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 176.041082164 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.640316205534 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 458.1 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.9724111152 49.4020404114 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.357142857 106.682146367 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0714285714 20.7667163134 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.92857142857 7.06120827912 41% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.281149239979 0.244688304435 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0848996197308 0.084324248473 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0525443434096 0.0667982634062 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.148975036464 0.151304729494 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0553746477599 0.056905535591 97% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.0946893788 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.28 50.2224549098 72% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.59 12.4159519038 134% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.77 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 78.4519038076 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.