Your friend has the opportunity to study in either one of two majors (fields of study). Which one of the following two types of majors do you think is a better choice and why?
- A major that would allow your friend to complete his or her studies and get a degree faster (so that your friend can start working full-time soon).
- A major that would require more years of study but is likely to lead to more and better employment opportunities and job offers in the future.
It comes with no doubt that choosing a studying major is one of the most important decisions we make in our life. We have two types of majors which are short-time studies and long-time studies. I am of the opinion that majors which take longer studying period yet lead to better job opportunities are more worthful. I believe in this for two reasons I explore in this essay.
To commence with, jobs that require a higher degree have a much better salary. When we studied longer and got a high degree in a major, we would find a much better job as a result of being able to apply for better positions. For instance, a friend of mine was deciding between two options. First, a two-year course in radiology and working in a hospital. Second, studying for about 4 years and become a nurse. Finally, he chose the first one to start working fulltime sooner. However, he is still working there, he feels regretful for not taking the second one and now earning at least a doubled salary. This is the reason I state that it is worthy to study for longer years but earn much better money.
In addition, not only is working in a big company pleasing, but also it has much better and faster progression opportunities. Being of longer study and a better degree, people can work in bigger companies which have more job promotions possibility. My own experience is a compelling example of this. After my Ph.D. in Pharmacology, I could get a great job in one of the most famous pharmacy companies. Moreover, now I am one of the owners. I could apply for that job first because of my Ph.D., otherwise, I could have never been hired in that great company. I suggest choosing a major that you can have great job promotions opportunities after hiring.
In conclusion I believe that Studying a major that takes a longer period but brings a better future is beneficial. It is because of a better annual salary and because of more job progressions opportunities, which can make life more pleasant.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-11-12 | Farahmad | 73 | view |
| 2020-05-17 | ArashAlirezaei | 60 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Grades marks encourage students to learn Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is often not a good thing for people to move to a new town or country because they lose their old friends Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Grades marks encourage students to learn Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Children rely too much on the technology like computers smart phones video games for fun and entertainment Playing simpler toys or playing outside with friends would be better for children s developmen 70
- Your friend has the opportunity to study in either one of two majors fields of study Which one of the following two types of majors do you think is a better choice and why A major that would allow your friend to complete his or her studies and get a degre 60
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, however, if, moreover, second, so, still, at least, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, no doubt, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.0286738351 127% => OK
Pronoun: 40.0 43.0788530466 93% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 52.1666666667 71% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1633.0 1977.66487455 83% => OK
No of words: 353.0 407.700716846 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.62606232295 4.8611393121 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.33454660006 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65996162344 2.67179642975 100% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 212.727598566 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.498583569405 0.524837075471 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 514.8 618.680645161 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 15.0 9.59856630824 156% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.1344086022 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.6452897987 48.9658058833 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 77.7619047619 100.406767564 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.8095238095 20.6045352989 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.7619047619 5.45110844103 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.275677897642 0.236089414692 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0854606239934 0.076458572812 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0644851904265 0.0737576698707 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.184433967436 0.150856017488 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0785204504471 0.0645574589148 122% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.8 11.7677419355 75% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 58.1214874552 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 10.1575268817 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.28 10.9000537634 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.83 8.01818996416 98% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 86.8835125448 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.002688172 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.0537634409 84% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, however, if, moreover, second, so, still, at least, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, no doubt, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.0286738351 127% => OK
Pronoun: 40.0 43.0788530466 93% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 52.1666666667 71% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1633.0 1977.66487455 83% => OK
No of words: 353.0 407.700716846 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.62606232295 4.8611393121 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.33454660006 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65996162344 2.67179642975 100% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 212.727598566 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.498583569405 0.524837075471 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 514.8 618.680645161 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 15.0 9.59856630824 156% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.1344086022 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.6452897987 48.9658058833 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 77.7619047619 100.406767564 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.8095238095 20.6045352989 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.7619047619 5.45110844103 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.275677897642 0.236089414692 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0854606239934 0.076458572812 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0644851904265 0.0737576698707 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.184433967436 0.150856017488 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0785204504471 0.0645574589148 122% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.8 11.7677419355 75% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 58.1214874552 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 10.1575268817 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.28 10.9000537634 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.83 8.01818996416 98% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 86.8835125448 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.002688172 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.0537634409 84% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.