The United Kingdom (sometimes referred to as Britain) has a long and rich history of human settlement. Traces of buildings, tools, and art can be found from periods going back many thousands of years: from the Stone Age, through the Bronze Age, the Iron Age, the time of the Roman colonization, the Middle Ages, up to the beginnings of the industrial age. Yet for most of the twentieth century, the science of archaeology, dedicated to uncovering and studying old cultural artifacts, was faced with serious problems and limitations in Britain.
First, many valuable artifacts were lost to construction projects. The growth of Britain's population, especially from the 1950s on, spurred a lot of new construction in British cities, towns, and villages. While digging foundations for new buildings, the builders often uncovered archaeologically valuable sites. Usually, however, they proceeded with the construction and did not preserve the artifacts. Many archaeologically precious artifacts were therefore destroyed.
Second, many archaeologists felt that the financial support for archaeological research was inadequate. For most of the twentieth century, archaeology was funded mostly through government funds and grants, which allowed archaeologists to investigate a handful of the most important sites but which left hundreds of other interesting projects without support. Furthermore, changing government priorities brought about periodic reductions in funding.
Third, it was difficult to have a career in archaeology. Archaeology jobs were to be found at universities or with a few government agencies, but there were never many positions available. Many people who wanted to become archaeologists ended up pursuing other careers and contributing to archaeological research only as unpaid amateurs.
The article claims that the archaeology science and scientists have faced several problems to do their role as needed to recognize and preserve huge amount of ancient artifacts in the Britain. It mentions three different problems in this context. On the other hand, the lecturer does not think so and she believes that with the new regualtions and rules the condition for archaeiology and expert people who work in this field has changed compeletly. She refuts all the writer's reasons.
First, the reading passage claims that many valuable artifacts has lost during the construction projects. However, the professor repudiates this motion by saying that with these regulations all the construction companies have to hire archaeologist to examine the construction base before beginning any projects. If there is any archaeology interest, the government and archaeologist will make a plan to preserve those invaluable artifact with building a wall around the base or doing a research about that.
Second, the reading passage asserts that archaeologist feel that there is not enough budgets to support the needed archaeology researchs. It adds that government priorities have changed and now it is a burdon on archaeology's projects. Nowadays, with these new laws all cost of the archaeology projects included the salary of experts should be paid by the construction companies, the professor says. She avers that all these newe monetary resources are helping the archaeology's investigations.
Third, the author claims that finding a related job in the archaeology field is so hard for graduates, and they should pursue the non-paid voluntery jobs in their field or work in unrelated jobs. Conversely, the speaker repudates this notion mentioning that new laws provide many job opportunities for expert archaeologist. Based on her assertion, there are many new jobs which have not been available before in thisw field included investigation in the construction base, preserving artifacts, doing research and analyaing the data and writing paper. She adds that these new jobs have a high salary which never has had.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-11-24 | Apolytos | 80 | view |
| 2023-06-15 | ormon200678 | 3 | view |
| 2023-01-13 | Umme Abiha | 3 | view |
| 2022-07-06 | Hello GRE | 3 | view |
| 2022-07-06 | Hello GRE | 3 | view |
- Question: Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Leadership comes naturally: one cannot learn to be a leader.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 76
- TPO26(independent)It is better for children to choose jobs that are similar to their parents jobs than to choose jobs that are very different from their parents jobs. 76
- In recent years many frog species around the world have declined in numbers or even gone extinct due to changes in their environment These population declines and extinctions have serious consequences for the ecosystems in which frogs live for example fro 80
- tpo 30 3
- With the speculation by many leading geologists that petroleum reserves will be exhausted within the next fifty years a number of alternatives to petroleum have been proposed One of the most promising alternatives being researched is hydrogen cell technol 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
.... She refuts all the writers reasons. First, the reading passage claims that m...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 490, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[1]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'research'.
Suggestion: research
...uilding a wall around the base or doing a research about that. Second, the reading...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... base or doing a research about that. Second, the reading passage asserts that...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ping the archaeologys investigations. Third, the author claims that finding a ...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
conversely, first, however, if, second, so, third, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.4613686534 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 5.04856512141 59% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 7.30242825607 164% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 12.0772626932 124% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 22.412803532 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 31.0 30.3222958057 102% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 5.01324503311 219% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1782.0 1373.03311258 130% => OK
No of words: 331.0 270.72406181 122% => OK
Chars per words: 5.3836858006 5.08290768461 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.26537283232 4.04702891845 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95421628726 2.5805825403 114% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 145.348785872 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.537764350453 0.540411800872 100% => OK
syllable_count: 531.9 419.366225166 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 3.25607064018 154% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 13.0662251656 115% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 21.2450331126 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.0742503537 49.2860985944 122% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.8 110.228320801 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0666666667 21.698381199 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.53333333333 7.06452816374 64% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 4.19205298013 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.27373068433 140% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0210983521679 0.272083759551 8% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.00775901624944 0.0996497079465 8% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.00968096312644 0.0662205650399 15% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0136249867053 0.162205337803 8% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00381369510815 0.0443174109184 9% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.3589403974 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 53.8541721854 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.0289183223 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.92 12.2367328918 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.64 8.42419426049 103% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 63.6247240618 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.498013245 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.