Classrooms are often a place for debates and talking about different views. While many people may believe it is not a good idea for a teacher to express his or her political and social beliefs, I think otherwise. In my opinion, it would be better if teachers make their views known to students since it is their job and makes children knowledgable about their surroundings.
First of all, a teacher's job is teaching and giving information to the pupils. In fact, they are employed and paid to do this. If teachers do not talk about their views, who is going to tell our kids about life issues? Students have no idea that who is who in politics and what social problems are since they are not mature enough to realize it themselves. For instance, when I was eighteen years old in high school, one of my teachers talked about the upcoming election. He informed us about how to vote and what every political party does and thinks. Then I could contemplate and decide which one to select for the election. If it were not for that teacher, I would have never been able to understand whom to vote at that time. Thus, it would be better if teachers could argue their political and social points of view.
In addition to the above statements, children need these types of discussions in class to learn about the society in which they live. It helps kids to be able to measure different and opposite sides of views and make better decisions in their life. For example, because I was debating in high school about various life matters with my fellow students and teachers, now that I am in university, not only can I discuss in the university auditorium, but also I hand in well-written papers about sociology as well. If that teacher did not let me talk in his class, I would not be able to thrive in university.
To sum it up, with all these statements taken into account, my firm belief is that teachers should be able to discuss their views on social and political matters; because it is their job and helps pupils know about their society.
- In today s world it is more important to work quickly and risk making mistakes than to work slowly and make sure that everything is correct 85
- Agree or disagree Working slowly and correctly or fast and risking more mistakes 66
- The ability to relate well to people is more important than studying hard in school 76
- It is more enjoyable to have a job where you work only three days a week for long hours than to have a job where you work five days a week for shorter hours 70
- Parents involved with their children s education 60
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
Classrooms are often a place for debates...
^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...knowledgable about their surroundings. First of all, a teachers job is teaching...
^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...r political and social points of view. In addition to the above statements, chi...
^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d not be able to thrive in university. To sum it up, with all these statements ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, may, so, then, thus, well, while, for example, for instance, i think, in addition, in fact, talking about, first of all, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 15.1003584229 132% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 13.8261648746 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 51.0 43.0788530466 118% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 52.1666666667 105% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1671.0 1977.66487455 84% => OK
No of words: 367.0 407.700716846 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.55313351499 4.8611393121 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37689890912 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.473430147 2.67179642975 93% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 212.727598566 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.514986376022 0.524837075471 98% => OK
syllable_count: 518.4 618.680645161 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 8.0 3.51792114695 227% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.0806779098 48.9658058833 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.2941176471 100.406767564 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5882352941 20.6045352989 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.17647058824 5.45110844103 168% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 11.8709677419 59% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.88709677419 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.362177903904 0.236089414692 153% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.105171161721 0.076458572812 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.11068792365 0.0737576698707 150% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.246652057045 0.150856017488 164% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.109884172121 0.0645574589148 170% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 11.7677419355 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 58.1214874552 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.1575268817 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.11 10.9000537634 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.26 8.01818996416 91% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 86.8835125448 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 65.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 19.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.