Some people think that a huge amount of time and money is spent on the protection of wild animals, and that this money could be better spent on the human population. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?
It is argued that governments should use their funds to invest in the preservation of wildlife. Others, however, think that using these funds to help people is better. In my view, the protection of wild animals is extremely important and that countries need to allocate money to preserve their native animal species.
In fact, the conservation of the natural animal world could bring many benefits to human. First of all, about medicine, many wildlife has found ways to fight off bacteria and cancer cells. They can create novel molecules that chemists have never known, and so, studying and researching these properties of species can help scientists find new, effective treatments. In the body of many plants and animals also contain useful chemicals, serving the production of pharmaceuticals. For example, In American, more than a quarter of prescription contain substances found in plants and animals. In addition, wild animals species can bring economic value. For instance, according to the Texas National Park and Wildlife Management Board, bird watching is the fastest growing recreational outdoor activity, estimated to contribute about 400 million each year to the state's budget. Research by the US Department of Wildlife and Fisheries also reported that observing the natural environment earned 85 billion dollars for the United State in 2001.
There are about 10 to 15 million species living on the planet together with humans creating a giant ecosystem whereby each part can influence the others. Therefore, the disappearance of one species will cause a chain reaction affecting many other species. Especially for the species that play an important role in the ecosystem, their extinction can lead to unpredictable consequences such as the gray wolf which is thought to be one of the most important species in the world.
In conclusion, for the aforementioned reasons, I believe that the maintaining of wildlife is an important issue that countries should consider. Because that not only reduce negative impacts on the environment caused by humans but also fetch many benefits through the development of the economy and the progression in medicine.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-08-28 | thanhtu000 | 84 | view |
- Percentage of different type of waste recycled 67
- Some people think that children should start school at a very early age but others believe that chilren should go to school until they are older Discuss both views and give your opinion 84
- In many nations people in huge cities either live alone or in small family units instead of in large extended family groups Is this a positive or negative trend 84
- In recent years the family structure has changed as well as family roles What are the changes occurring Do you think these changes are positive or negative 89
- The table shows the number of employees and factories producing silk in England and Wales between 1851 and 1901 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 121, Rule ID: MANY_NN_U[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun wildlife seems to be uncountable; consider using: 'much wildlife', 'a good deal of wildlife'.
Suggestion: much wildlife; a good deal of wildlife
...to human. First of all, about medicine, many wildlife has found ways to fight off bacteria an...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 608, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'animals'' or 'animal's'?
Suggestion: animals'; animal's
...n plants and animals. In addition, wild animals species can bring economic value. For i...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 989, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...observing the natural environment earned 85 billion dollars for the United State ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, so, therefore, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, in fact, such as, first of all, in my view
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.3376753507 192% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1831.0 1615.20841683 113% => OK
No of words: 341.0 315.596192385 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.36950146628 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29722995808 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86954304916 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 206.0 176.041082164 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.604105571848 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 554.4 506.74238477 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.59972833 49.4020404114 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.4375 106.682146367 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3125 20.7667163134 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.9375 7.06120827912 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0886831586061 0.244688304435 36% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0315904226825 0.084324248473 37% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0434267932293 0.0667982634062 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.056052156321 0.151304729494 37% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0466264230369 0.056905535591 82% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.87 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.45 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 78.4519038076 131% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.