The graph below shows trends in US meat and poultry consumption
The line graph illustrates the amount of beef, pork, broilers and turkey consumed by Americans from 1955 to 2012.
It is clear that the beef and pork consumption dramatically decreased while that of broilers and turkey increased over the 57 years of period. Also, the quantity of beef was the most popular of the four types of meat over the whole period.
In 1955, the amount of beef consumed by Americans was the highest, at around 58 pounds per person per year, then it increased rapidly to a peak of 90 pounds in 1976 before decreasing gradually by about 50 pounds in 2012. Meanwhile, US pork consumption fluctuated between about 38 pounds and 55 pounds from 1955 to 2000 and reached over 40 pounds per capita in 2012.
Beginning in 1961, the yearly consumption of broilers achieved just about 15 pounds. This figure dramatically rose to peak at 60 pounds in 2009 and then slightly declined to about 55 pounds per capita at the end of period. Likewise, turkey consumption grew up from 5 pounds to over 10 pounds throughout 51 years.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-22 | hahoaan | 73 | view |
| 2024-11-20 | Giang Tran | 78 | view |
| 2024-11-16 | hahoaan | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-09 | trinhthanh1 | 78 | view |
| 2024-11-07 | hahoaan | 73 | view |
- The graph below shows population figures for India and China since the year 2000 and predicted population growth up untill 2050
- Some employers reward members of staff for their exceptional contribute to the company by giving them extra money This practical can act as an incentive for some but may be also have a negative impact on others To what extend is this style of management e 73
- The graph below shows trends in US meat and poultry consumption
- Successful sports professionals can earn a great deal more money than people in other important professions Some people think this is fully justified while others think it is unfair Discuss both these views and give your opinion Give reasons for your answ 77
- Nowadays the way many people interact with each other has changed because of technology In what ways has technology affected the types of relationships people make Has this become a positive or negative development 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, likewise, so, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 33.7804878049 130% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 859.0 965.302439024 89% => OK
No of words: 182.0 196.424390244 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.71978021978 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.67297393991 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56762774421 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 96.0 106.607317073 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.527472527473 0.547539520022 96% => OK
syllable_count: 232.2 283.868780488 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.3867052929 43.030603864 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.375 112.824112599 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.75 22.9334400587 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.875 5.23603664747 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0773223327218 0.215688989381 36% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0425514295517 0.103423049105 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0257521781069 0.0843802449381 31% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.052271606764 0.15604864568 33% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0104230898369 0.0819641961636 13% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.2329268293 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 74.53 61.2550243902 122% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.39 11.4140731707 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.07 8.06136585366 88% => OK
difficult_words: 27.0 40.7170731707 66% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.