Increasing the price of petrol is the best way to solve growing traffic and pollution problems. To what extent do you agree or disagree? What other measures do you think might be effective?
Global warming is one of the major 21st century problems due to increasing pollution ratio from machines and factories. Some people have suggested increasing the petrol price in order to solve the pollution problem and to reduce roads congestion, however, others disagree. In my opinion I totally agree with the idea of raising petrol price in order to solve these problems.
On the one hand, high benzene and gasoline prices will push most of the people toward using of public transport. Public transport like buses, trains and subways are cheaper compared to that of petrol required for the same trip on a private car. This would eventually reduce the numbers of cars on the roads and hence less toxic air gases and less crowded roads. Furthermore, if petrol price is raised, most citizens will begin to look for more cheap sources of energy and will reduce their dependency on their own vehicles. Other energy sources like electricity and some air friendly organic gases are now available for home use. Bicycles, for example, have become an acceptable mean of transport in major developed cities like Tokyo, and thereby they can be a perfect substitution for petrol based machines.
On the other hand, some people think that elevation of petrol price would affect mainly the poor population. In the first place, the tickets of the public transport would rise as a result of expensive energy, and it is well known that the lower and middle class community members are the main public transport customers.
Nowadays the world began to search for other natural energy sources that have lesser harmful effects on the atmosphere. These include solar energy and electrical energy and other sources which are now under development like water based energy.
In conclusion, there are both arguments for and against increasing the petrol price in order to reduce pollution and traffic. Although this might affect the poor ones, it will result in great reduction of private cars on the road that would help in these problems solution. Personally I think in order to reduce pollution and traffic, petrol consumption should be reduced and increasing its price is one of the best strategies to achieve these problems.
- Should arts-related entertainment venues such as museums and art galleries be free of charge for the general public, or should a charge apply for admittance?Discuss this issue, and give your opinion. 60
- In some countries people who are unemployed receive a sum of money each week in the form of a benefit While some support this other people believe that this money should not be given Discuss both points of view and give your own point of view 58
- Nowadays the way many people interact with each other has changed because of technology.In what ways has technology affected personal relationships ? Has this become a positive or negative development? 70
- Using a computer every day can have more negative than positive effects on children.Do you agree or disagree?Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience. 40
- It is generally believed that some people are born with some talents, for instance for sport or music, and others are not. However it is sometimes claimed that any child can be taught to become a good sport person or musician.Discuss both these views and 73
Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 7.0 out of 9
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 16 15
No. of Words: 365 350
No. of Characters: 1807 1500
No. of Different Words: 189 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.371 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.951 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.359 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 132 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 88 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 55 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 38 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 22.812 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 5.175 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.562 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.347 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.595 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.063 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 5 5