Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? the more money people have, the more they should contribute to charity
From a general standpoint, in today's sophisticated world we observe, in which, people are striving to earn money as much as possible and it is not far-fetched for one to presume that the wealthy people have the most contribution in pushing the societies forward. One of the controversial questions is whether the more money people have, the more they should participate in charity or not. I'm of the opinion that the well-heeled people should contribute to charity more and in what fallows I will further elaborate on my perspective.
First and foremost, by contributing to some charity, wealthy people can gain a sense of self-satisfaction which is an immense asset. Nowadays, the rate of poverty all around the world has intensified and the number of people who are suffering from lack of sufficient food or appropriate shelter has increased. Moreover, all of the people have inherently inclination to help others and they seize all opportunities to help people especially the poor. People who can make a lot of money can benefit from their position and contribute to some philanthropic activities. Admittedly, when well-heeled people see a child who cannot meet his basic vital needs, they will be satisfied if they provide him with a delicious meal or an elegant cloth. As a result, it gives a sense of satisfaction and can be more satisfied. Most of celebrities who have a huge amount of money, have admitted that they participate in some altruistic activities only since they would be happier. In this situation, not only, do they help some poor people but also they make themselves happy.
Secondly, when wealthy people contribute to charity, it helps the society economically recover its balance. In past decades, due to the soaring inflation, the gap between the poor and the wealthy people has soared. I think one of the wealthy people's responsibility is removing or ameliorating this gap. By devoting money to charity, they can bridge the widening gap between the poor and the rich. As a future consequence, we will have a society whose people have the average welfare and won't have poor and misery citizens. For example, in India, most of people are poor and they don't have even a decent job to upbringing their children well, however, its affluent people enjoy from having a lot of money to the extent that they don't know how to disburse it. If these people assign a part of their income to charity and help poor people, I think they would have had a better and prosperous society in which children can live more convenient. It’s a game of consequences, the more the rich people dedicate money to poor people, the more balanced the society we have.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-09-08 | Ayshan saleki | 87 | view |
| 2020-07-03 | ela87urb@gmail.com | 73 | view |
| 2020-06-19 | maryamss | 70 | view |
| 2019-11-11 | nazbanu | 45 | view |
| 2018-08-23 | zabanfinish | 82 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement the more money people have the more they should contribute to charity 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is important to read or watch news presented by people with different views than people by similar views 60
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Leadership comes naturally One cannot learn how to develop it 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement The most important things people learn are from families 68
- Students must volunteer to work in the university s city or their hometowns to improve some aspects of life of the city or their own town 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 390, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: I'm
...y should participate in charity or not. Im of the opinion that the well-heeled peo...
^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...l further elaborate on my perspective. First and foremost, by contributing to s...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 321, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...priate shelter has increased. Moreover, all of the people have inherently inclination to h...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 813, Rule ID: MOST_SOME_OF_NNS[1]
Message: After 'Most of', you should use 'the' ('Most of the celebrities') or simply say ''Most celebrities''.
Suggestion: Most of the celebrities; Most celebrities
...satisfaction and can be more satisfied. Most of celebrities who have a huge amount of money, have a...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 547, Rule ID: MOST_SOME_OF_NNS[1]
Message: After 'most of', you should use 'the' ('most of the people') or simply say ''most people''.
Suggestion: most of the people; most people
...misery citizens. For example, in India, most of people are poor and they dont have even a dece...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 580, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...India, most of people are poor and they dont have even a decent job to upbringing th...
^^^^
Line 6, column 729, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
... a lot of money to the extent that they dont know how to disburse it. If these peopl...
^^^^
Line 6, column 1066, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... the more balanced the society we have.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, well, for example, i think, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 15.1003584229 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 9.8082437276 143% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 13.8261648746 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.0286738351 127% => OK
Pronoun: 39.0 43.0788530466 91% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 52.1666666667 104% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2221.0 1977.66487455 112% => OK
No of words: 452.0 407.700716846 111% => OK
Chars per words: 4.91371681416 4.8611393121 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.61088837703 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84217820278 2.67179642975 106% => OK
Unique words: 220.0 212.727598566 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.486725663717 0.524837075471 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 707.4 618.680645161 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.6925169947 48.9658058833 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.894736842 100.406767564 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.7894736842 20.6045352989 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.36842105263 5.45110844103 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.53405017921 66% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 8.0 5.5376344086 144% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 11.8709677419 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.88709677419 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.368669884684 0.236089414692 156% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.129941081221 0.076458572812 170% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.090042419476 0.0737576698707 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.288175154239 0.150856017488 191% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0597877975401 0.0645574589148 93% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 11.7677419355 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 58.1214874552 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.1575268817 121% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 10.9000537634 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.45 8.01818996416 105% => OK
difficult_words: 105.0 86.8835125448 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.002688172 140% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.247311828 137% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.