Some governments have banned smoking in all public places. Do you agree or disagree with this decision?
It is argued that smoking can help people work more effectively and feel relaxed after long working hours. However, I totally agree that it must be prohibited from public places because of the drawbacks affecting our daily life.
In my opinion, governments should pass a law that prevents smoking in public because it brings a lot of harm to everyone, even if they don’t smoke. Firstly, many studies have shown that smoking cigarettes for a long time will increase the risk of sickness. For example, the number of people having problems with the respiratory system, the skin, the eye has been rising year after year, especially lung cancer with more than 30% of cancer patients. Secondly, smoking is one of the reasons that caused accidents. In fact, many people throw away cigarette ash in the streets or anywhere without knowing that these are not only dirty but also dangerous. As a result, workers must spend more time cleaning the roads and sometimes lead to many fires killing and injuring lots of people around the world. Thirdly, people addicted to smoking will spend plenty of money on it. Consequently, it’s extremely hard for them to improve their quality of life or helping countries to develop the economy.
While I support the banning of smoking in public places, I believe that it would be wrong if thinking that smoking can help better work better and reduce stress. First and foremost, success depends on how well people plan and organize their work, how carefully they manage time, not the number of cigarettes. Another important thing is doing exercise is the best way to keep fit and relaxed after hard-working days. In contrast to that, smoking will destroy our health. Finally, smoking is a big waste of time as other meaningful things can be done to the community.
In conclusion, banning smoking in public places is the most effective method to improve people’s health, save time and money.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-07-03 | nangtienngu | 89 | view |
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, finally, first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, third, thirdly, well, while, for example, in conclusion, in contrast, in fact, as a result, in contrast to, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 8.3376753507 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1606.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 324.0 315.596192385 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.95679012346 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24264068712 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.43806843973 2.80592935109 87% => OK
Unique words: 198.0 176.041082164 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.611111111111 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 485.1 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.1349467275 49.4020404114 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.375 106.682146367 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.25 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.875 7.06120827912 182% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.189097341843 0.244688304435 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0590613616466 0.084324248473 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0495642135144 0.0667982634062 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.12282460473 0.151304729494 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0237477325241 0.056905535591 42% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 50.2224549098 119% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 12.4159519038 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.19 8.58950901804 95% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 78.4519038076 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.