In developing countries, Some people believe that their government should introduce new technology to people to improve their quality of life. Others believe that offering free education would be more advantageous in the long term. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
Gone are the days, when geographical boundaries delineated the developing countries. In the last few decades, many underdeveloped nations have adopted the latest tech tools to improve the living standard of their citizens. However, I am of the opinion that the availability of a free education system, rather than tech-enabled amenities, is of prime importance. Free-schooling will contribute more in helping these growing economies to join the ranks of developed parts of the globe.
Governments often choose to pick the quickest possible development route - by providing their citizens with the latest tech facilities. For example, countries like Venezuela and Brazil, imported technology to build not only an advanced metro rail system, but also multi-lane highways coupled with high-tech traffic control systems. While these facilities gave the appearance of a well-established country, in contrast, it proved to be only a short-term solution. Since the population was not empowered by learning, many people ended up flouting rules. As a result, all the advanced facilities were rendered useless.
On the other hand, ensuring complimentary learning facilities, across all age-groups, plays a pivotal role in the organic development of a nation. Besides, the educated and well-read students, and citizens become more aware of the advancements in the other parts of the world. For this reason, they not only appreciate the importance of intellectual knowledge, but also, by imbibing technology, actively participate in raising the living standard of the society. To illustrate further, citizens from countries like the Philippines and Vietnam, have risen to be recognized in the global forum, as talented workforce. In particular, this recognition was mostly a consequence of the free school system provided to them.
To conclude, I concur with the view that free education plays a significant role in not just the growth, but also the lifestyle of a developing country. Therefore, it is imperative that governments in these parts of the world spend their budget wisely, to develop human capital rather than give it away just for tech-powered public amenities.
- Smacking children to is the best method to discipline To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- Some people think the government should focus on improving the economy of the country Other people think the government should focus on social services such as health and education programs Which statement do you agree with Explain and provide examples to 83
- Smacking children to is the best method to discipline To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- In developing countries Some people believe that their government should introduce new technology to people in order to improve their quality of life Others believe that offering free education would be more advantageous in the long term Discuss both thes 84
- Some people believe that media should be allowed to publish information about the private lives of famous people Others say that everybody has a right to privacy and this practice must be controlled or even stopped Discuss both views 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 6, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'is'.
Suggestion: is
Gone are the days, when geographical boundaries ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, however, if, so, therefore, well, while, for example, in contrast, in particular, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 7.85571142285 13% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1840.0 1615.20841683 114% => OK
No of words: 331.0 315.596192385 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.55891238671 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.26537283232 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.12634932402 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 203.0 176.041082164 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.61329305136 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 584.1 506.74238477 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 10.0 4.76152304609 210% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.3902459459 49.4020404114 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.0 106.682146367 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6875 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.25 7.06120827912 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.193107223377 0.244688304435 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0544436162205 0.084324248473 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0313176775779 0.0667982634062 47% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.113033451952 0.151304729494 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0196540694573 0.056905535591 35% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 50.2224549098 68% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.97 12.4159519038 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.4 8.58950901804 121% => OK
difficult_words: 121.0 78.4519038076 154% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.