Some people think that couples should live together before getting married to start knowing each other better and see if they are compatible. Others say that because of this tendency people become immoral and only deep emotional attachment makes a durable alliance. What is your opinion?
Nowadays living together before marriage becomes very common. While some people think that cohabiting with one's significant other before marriage helps couples to test their compatibility in the long-term vision, others describe premarital cohabitation in pejorative terms and often think that this phenomenon is immoral. I believe that in most cases living together prior to marriage is a welcome development in human relationships.
Firstly, I think that couples who have already tried the proposition of living together before marriage, and intimately tested their compatibility, can make a better-informed decision whether or not to get married. In other words, getting to know another person's advantages and disadvantages takes time and cohabitation is one of the best solutions which can provide a more solid and successful common future. For example, a recent survey showed that today, in Ukraine two thirds of happy marriages are preceded by cohabitation.
Moreover, in my view, having often grown up as the products of divorce, people have come to see cohabitation as a low-risk way to test a marriage-like relationship and avoid the pitfalls of their parents. In fact, a vast majority of Ukrainian young adults believe that living together prior to marriage is an effective way to prevent divorce and ensure a happy union. Such approach of a new generation towards marriages is beneficial for whole country because of high rate of divorces due to the burdens of time when premarital cohabitation was less popular.
In conclusion, I think that living together before marriage includes a lot of benefits for young couples. Among them the main two are to start to know each other better due to check out the compatibility of one's significant other, and to gain confidence in the future, which will in turn provide insurance against divorces.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-08 | SUSANNA PETROSYAN | 84 | view |
| 2020-07-18 | katenokk84 | 78 | view |
| 2020-02-24 | SUSANNA PETROSYAN | 81 | view |
| 2019-11-27 | SUSANNA PETROSYAN | 84 | view |
- The line graph below shows the proportion of the population aged 65 and over between 1940 and 2040 in three different countries 73
- Some people think that it is necessary to travel abroad to learn about other countries but others think that it is not necessary to travel abroad because all the information can be seen on TV and the internet Discuss both views and give your own opinion 73
- Nowadays celebrities earn more money than politicians What are the reasons for this Is it a positive or negative development 78
- Many students around the world don t choose science subjects at university Give the reasons for this and describe the impact on the community 56
- Some people think that it is necessary to travel abroad to learn about other countries but others think that it is not necessary to travel abroad because all the information can be seen on TV and the internet Discuss both views and give your own opinion 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 185, Rule ID: WHETHER[7]
Message: Perhaps you can shorten this phrase to just 'whether'. It is correct though if you mean 'regardless of whether'.
Suggestion: whether
...ty, can make a better-informed decision whether or not to get married. In other words, getting...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, if, moreover, so, third, while, for example, i think, in conclusion, in fact, in most cases, in my view, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 41.998997996 124% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1564.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 294.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.31972789116 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14082457966 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00177342804 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.591836734694 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 509.4 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 57.5575888399 49.4020404114 117% => OK
Chars per sentence: 142.181818182 106.682146367 133% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.7272727273 20.7667163134 129% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.2727272727 7.06120827912 174% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.266144552377 0.244688304435 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0943914948289 0.084324248473 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0666944079425 0.0667982634062 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.165530763284 0.151304729494 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0696183158149 0.056905535591 122% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.0 13.0946893788 130% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.63 50.2224549098 73% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.87 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.38 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 78.4519038076 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.