The pie chart shows the amount of money that a children's charity located in the USA spent and received in one year.
The pie charts compare the information about revenue and expenditure of a children’s charity in the USA during a year. Overall, it can be clearly seen that total income is higher than total expenditure.
According to the first pie chart, it can be seen that a very large majority of donated food comprises the revenue sources, whereas in expenditures program services are a vast part of the second pie chart which is 95.8 %.
Excepted the donated food, the revenue sources have other types of income such as community contributions which make just over 10%. Then, there is also program revenue with a small fraction of total income, whilst investment income and government grants have the equal index (0,2%) and others do not have a significant percentage.
Pie chart presented the data about expenditure is divided into three parts: program services, fundraising and management and general charge. Compared to fundraising, management and general expenses are less for a per cent, which makes 2.6% and 1.6% respectively.
- The charts below show the percentage of their food budget the average family spent on restaurant meals in different years The graph shows the number of meals eaten in fast food restaurants and sit down restaurants You should write at least 150 words 92
- In some countries young people are encouraged to work or travel for a year between finishing high school and starting university. discuss the advantages and disadvantages for young people who decide to do this. 70
- The charts below show the number of Japanese tourists travelling abroad between 1985 and 1995 and Australia’s share of the Japanese tourist market.Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information shown below. 80
- The pie chart shows the amount of money that a children's charity located in the USA spent and received in one year. 80
- The line graph shows thefts per thousand vehicles in four European countries between 1990 and 1999.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 70
Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 7.0 out of 9
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 7 10
No. of Words: 165 200
No. of Characters: 828 1000
No. of Different Words: 102 100
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 3.584 4.0
Average Word Length: 5.018 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.725 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 58 60
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 46 50
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 27 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 20 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 23.571 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 8.051 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.429 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.448 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.785 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.125 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 4