The bar chart compares the proportion of households in England and Wales, which were living in owned and rented accommodation, between 1918 and 2011.
Overall, the figure for households in owned accommodation experienced a steady increase and exceeded that for households in rented accommodation after 1971. By contrast, there was an opposite trend in the proportion of households living in rented accommodation.
It can be seen from the graph that the percentage of households in owned accommodation was relatively small in 1918, at just above 20%. This figure increased to 31% in 1939 and remained constant in 1953. Afterward, it witnessed a steady increase to just below 70% in 2001, surpassing the figure for households living in rented accommodation after 1971. However, this figure slightly declined by about 5% in 2011.
By contrast, the proportion of households in rented accommodation was more than three times as high as that of households in owned accommodation, standing at approximately 77%. This figure consistently decreased between 1939 and 2001. The gap between the two figures gradually narrowed until they reached the same level at 50% in 1971. Afterward, the proportion of households living in rented accommodation continued declining until it reached its lowest point at 31% in 2001. This figure slightly increased by 5% in 2011.
- In the future nobody will buy printed newspapers or books because they will be able to read everything they want online without paying What extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 82
- Some experts believe that it is better for children to begin learning a foreign language at primary school rather than secondary school Do the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages 42
- The maps below show the centre of a small town called Islip as it is now and plans for its development Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- At the present time the population of some countries includes a relatively large number of young adults compared with the number of older people Do you think that the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages 73
- The graph below shows the differences in wheat exports over three different areas Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information shown below 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 5.60731707317 214% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 47.0 33.7804878049 139% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 3.97073170732 327% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1147.0 965.302439024 119% => OK
No of words: 213.0 196.424390244 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.38497652582 4.92477711251 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82027741392 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.14216762684 2.65546596893 118% => OK
Unique words: 101.0 106.607317073 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.474178403756 0.547539520022 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 333.0 283.868780488 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 1.53170731707 392% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 43.3596074193 43.030603864 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.5833333333 112.824112599 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.75 22.9334400587 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.583333333333 5.23603664747 11% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.233359837763 0.215688989381 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0953881143301 0.103423049105 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0708762731321 0.0843802449381 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.180008532607 0.15604864568 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0512941380673 0.0819641961636 63% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 61.2550243902 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.63 11.4140731707 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.44 8.06136585366 92% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.