In some countries, private cars are now banned from certain city centres.
What are the advantages of such a system and do you feel that this is something that most cities should adopt?
In different city centres, there is a measure that forbid four wheels private transport and I suppose that a myriad of benefits come from this policy and I strongly support its expansion.
To begin with, I believe in the benefits of introduction of such policy on both the environment and human. The prohibition of family-owned cars would be a stimulus for the use of public transport, a funding source for governments. In addition, it also helps to alleviate the large volume on traffic on roads, reducing traffic congestion and road degradation, minimizing the amount of fumes emitted to the environment. Futhurmore, car restriction is also a discouragement factor on future car purchases, prolonging the above benefits.
As far as I am concerned, I strongly support the deployment of this policy in urban centres. Firstly, people now have to face with the alarming status of environment, especially the greenhouse effect and air pollution partly from fumes emitted. Secondly, it is notable that the birth rate has increased significantly over the past few years, which contributes to the evergrowing population, which is the main contributing factor to high traffic volume. Therefore, car restriction policies would be great help for the current situation.
However, as for the rising living standards these days, it is normal for most families living in city centres to have their own car, in which car restriction could suffer from major objection. Besides, bankruptcy could occur among large car manufacturers since wealthy city-dwellers are main customers of them, which could leave a negative effect on the economy. Hence, I think charging a higher fee for car usage could be a better measure, leaving private transport as a luxurious mode of transport for the upperclass.
In conclusion, due to environmental concerns and dense population contributes to high amount of trafffic, the benefits of such car restriction policy are valuable. However, complete ban in city centres could arise other problems, I highly support charging a higher fee for car driving.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-07-27 | hungdung2507 | 78 | view |
| 2019-02-06 | mayankdhami | 73 | view |
- Many cities around the world are considering turning streets into car free zones which help curb pollution and make people healthier However some people believe that cities will suffer once this becomes the norm In your opinion what are the advantages and 85
- Some people prefer to provide help and support directly to those in need Others however prefer to give money to national and international charitable organisations Discuss both these views and give your own opinion Give reasons for your answer and include 89
- Some people say that the main environmental problem of our time is the loss of particular species of plants and animals, others say that there are more important environmental problems.Discuss both these views and give your own opinion. 89
- Some people say that citizens should be given freedom to express their personal opinions and concerns about the social problems on the Internet To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- Some working parents think that childcare centres provide the best care for children who are still too young to go to school Other working parents think that family members such as grandparents will be better carers for their children Discuss both views a 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 45, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this day' or 'these days'?
Suggestion: this day; these days
...ver, as for the rising living standards these day, it is normal for most families living ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 201, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ld suffer from major objection. Besides, bankruptcy could occur among large car m...
^^
Line 4, column 471, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[3]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'luxurious transport'.
Suggestion: luxurious transport
...r measure, leaving private transport as a luxurious transport for the upperclass. In conclusion, due...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, firstly, hence, however, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, as for, i suppose, i think, in addition, in conclusion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 8.3376753507 228% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1738.0 1615.20841683 108% => OK
No of words: 327.0 315.596192385 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.31498470948 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25242769721 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06032640956 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.565749235474 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 540.9 506.74238477 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.4036031473 49.4020404114 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.142857143 106.682146367 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.3571428571 20.7667163134 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.7142857143 7.06120827912 166% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.16893317659 0.244688304435 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0580477082373 0.084324248473 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0460114544408 0.0667982634062 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.100377376943 0.151304729494 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.039067146573 0.056905535591 69% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.0946893788 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.81 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.36 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 78.4519038076 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.