Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
Primary school teachers should not give children (aged 5-10) assignments for more than 30 minutes, because there are enough instructions to learn in regular school classes.
Recently the phenomenon of the amount of time that children allocate to their assignments has sparked a heated debate. In this connection, although some people believe that schoolchildren should dedicate more than thirty minutes to their homework, I hold that teachers should reduce the number of students' tasks since they gain enough information at school time. I will analyze my reasons throughout this essay.
First of all, when primary students with a hard day at school to learn new materials, are asked to perform homework for more than 30 minutes, it does not improve their knowledge. To be more specific, If children want to perform tasks at home, they won't be able to do their favorite activities helping them learn effectively by reducing their mental pressure. According to my own experience, when I was an eight-year-old student, I had a strict teacher giving students a considerable amount of homework. However, all my classmates and I finish assignments at home, we neither comprehend them nor answered them correctly. After our parents talk to an adviser, he told lack of concentration reduces pupils' brain efficiency. He mentioned that allocating more than half an hour to tasks at home prevents learners from participating in enjoyable activities, which have a vital role in increasing their stress, leading to children's distraction. Accordingly, our teacher decided to eliminate our homework, which increased our brain performance.
Secondly, teachers should diminish primary students' assignments to less than 30 minutes; otherwise, the relationship between parents and pupils become weak. To elucidate, there is a correlation between the amount of homework and the level of arguments that children experience at home because children do not finish their homework unless their parents force them. By doing so, they will have a daily contention, which is harmful to developing a relationship in families. For example, I have a twin sister and brother who are first-grade students, and they go to a different school. That my sister's teacher gives her a whole raft of tasks reduces her motivation to do them. Therefore, my mother always argues with her over her unfinished assignments, so it causes family conflict. Conversely, my brother should not hand in homework, so he has enough time to share enjoyable activities with the family members. Moreover, my mother always plays with my brother, which strengthens their relationship.
To conclude, I profoundly believe that teachers should not give assignments to primary children more than half an hour per day. Not only does homework prevent students from learning deeply, but it also has a detrimental effect on family bonding.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is as important for older people to learn and study new things as young people to do so 85
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Some lessons for young students 5 8 years old increase their interest to learn including video games But some people believe it will distract young students 90
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is better to make friends with intelligent people than with the people who have a good sense of humor 76
- When you give money to charitable organizations do you prefer to choose how the donation will be used e g donate money on food or service or leave the decision to the organizations 88
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement In modern times parents will learn more from their children than their children will learn from them 85
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 518, Rule ID: WHO_NOUN[1]
Message: A noun should not follow "who". Try changing to a verb or maybe to 'who is a are'.
Suggestion: who is a are
...ample, I have a twin sister and brother who are first-grade students, and they go to a ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, but, conversely, first, however, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, then, therefore, for example, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 15.1003584229 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 13.8261648746 51% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.0286738351 127% => OK
Pronoun: 57.0 43.0788530466 132% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 55.0 52.1666666667 105% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2279.0 1977.66487455 115% => OK
No of words: 427.0 407.700716846 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.33723653396 4.8611393121 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.54576487731 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97547412067 2.67179642975 111% => OK
Unique words: 232.0 212.727598566 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.543325526932 0.524837075471 104% => OK
syllable_count: 686.7 618.680645161 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 16.0 9.59856630824 167% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.6459861898 48.9658058833 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.95 100.406767564 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.35 20.6045352989 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.5 5.45110844103 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.237201730056 0.236089414692 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0720253534041 0.076458572812 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0644831510537 0.0737576698707 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.163632991277 0.150856017488 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0136970171215 0.0645574589148 21% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 11.7677419355 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 58.1214874552 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.69 10.9000537634 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.71 8.01818996416 109% => OK
difficult_words: 109.0 86.8835125448 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.002688172 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.