These days, a higher number of games played by men are broadcast, compared to that of women. There are several reasons why man's sport take precedence over women's. This essay aims to discuss them and arrives to a logical conclusion whether or not TV channels give equal attention for both men's and women's sport show.
In terms of the principal reasons behind the unfair priority for men's sport show, the audience is considered to be the most influential factor. A growing number of people have more interest in men's sporting events, outnumbering people watching show of female counterparts. More viewers mean more profits, advertising contracts for TV channels broadcasting the shows. Take football in Viet Nam as a example. Men' football match at 30th SEA games attracted millions of viewers, while the figure for women's match is significantly lower. Therefore, giving the men's sport the priority is the wise strategy for TV channels.
However, I would argue that TV channels should not be biased toward men's sporting events and female athletes should be given more opportunities. If men's sport shows continue to receives significantly more coverage than that shows of the opposite sex, it would lead to gender inequality, which is one of the most serious issue in many countries of the world today. Another thing is that more and more attention would be placed on female athletes in the future; therefore; the TV channels should concentrate on this area in order to ensure their profits as well as gender equality.
In conclusion, the audience is the major factor that contribute to unfair priority for men's sporting events, and I am of the opinion that there should be equality in the coverage of men's and women's sport show.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Attending a live performance is more enjoyable than watching the same event on television 70
- In the past the main role of teachers was providing information Today with various sources of information available to students teachers have no role in modern education To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- The users of social media such as Facebook Twitter are replacing face to face contact in this century Do you think the advantages of this way outweigh the disadvantages 78
- Some people believe that physical fitness of strong individuals and teams is the reason for most sports achievements Others however think that mental attitude is more important Discuss both views and give your own opinion 73
- Research shows that business meetings discussions and training are happening online nowadays Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 232, Rule ID: WHETHER[7]
Message: Perhaps you can shorten this phrase to just 'whether'. It is correct though if you mean 'regardless of whether'.
Suggestion: whether
...hem and arrives to a logical conclusion whether or not TV channels give equal attention for bo...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 397, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...the shows. Take football in Viet Nam as a example. Men football match at 30th SEA...
^
Line 5, column 178, Rule ID: TO_NON_BASE[1]
Message: The verb after "to" should be in the base form: 'receive'.
Suggestion: receive
...nities. If mens sport shows continue to receives significantly more coverage than that s...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, so, therefore, well, while, another thing, in conclusion, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1447.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 288.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.02430555556 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11953428781 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65159359477 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 155.0 176.041082164 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.538194444444 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 438.3 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.8292670087 49.4020404114 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.307692308 106.682146367 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1538461538 20.7667163134 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.61538461538 7.06120827912 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.56166870054 0.244688304435 230% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.195161983367 0.084324248473 231% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.109946133938 0.0667982634062 165% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.367249040832 0.151304729494 243% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0403279211509 0.056905535591 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 50.2224549098 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 12.4159519038 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.68 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 78.4519038076 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.