Private collectors have been selling and buying fossils, the petrified remains of ancient organisms, ever since the eighteenth century. In recent years, however, the sale of fossils, particularly of dinosaurs and other large vertebrates, has grown into a big business. Rare and important fossils are now being sold to private ownership for millions of dollars. This is an unfortunate development for both scientists and the general public.
The public suffers because fossils that would otherwise be donated to museums where everyone can see them are sold to private collectors who do not allow the public to view their collections. Making it harder for the public to see fossils can lead to a decline in public interest in fossils, which would be a pity.
More importantly, scientists are likely to lose access to some of the most important fossils and thereby miss out on potentially crucial discoveries about extinct life forms. Wealthy fossil buyers with a desire to own the rarest and most important fossils can spend virtually limitless amounts of money to acquire them. Scientists and the museums and universities they work for often cannot compete successfully for fossils against millionaire fossil buyers.
Moreover, commercial fossil collectors often destroy valuable scientific evidence associated with the fossils they unearth. Most commercial fossil collectors are untrained or uninterestedin carrying out the careful field work and documentation that reveal the most about animal life in the past. For example, scientists have learned about the biology of nest-building dinosaurs called oviraptors by carefully observing the exact position of oviraptor fossils in the ground and the presence of other fossils in the immediate surroundings. Commercial fossil collectors typically pay no attention to how fossils lie in the ground or to the smaller fossils that may surround bigger ones.
The reading holds a negative attitude towards the open commercial market about fossils and states three reasons while the lecture disapprove these views and rebuts them.
First, the reading mentions that private collectors can buy fossils and eliminate the chances that the public can see those fossils which supposed to be exhibited in the museums. Instead, the lecture states that with the rising of need, there will have more exposures and more fossils are reachable simultaneously.
Moreover, the reading claims that public bureaus and scientists cannot compete with rich fossil buyers to obtain fossils. Nonetheless, the lecture reminds us before the fossils are being purchased, they should go through a series of examinations and detail tests by professional scientists so the valuable data cannot be ignored or lost.
Finally, albeit the reading declares that many fossil buyers do not treat fossils appropriately and leads to valuable information missed out, the lecture refutes it since there are too few fossils had been discovered. With enough quantities of exposed fossils, the public and scientists can benefit from them.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-04-30 | Yam Kumar Oli | 3 | view |
| 2022-12-26 | YAGUT | 81 | view |
| 2022-11-11 | stupidfella | 73 | view |
| 2022-10-16 | Prabesh Dhakal | 68 | view |
| 2022-10-16 | _sta | 73 | view |
- Toward the end of his life the Chevalier de Seingalt 1725 1798 wrote a long memoir recounting his life and adventures the Chevalier was a somewhat controversial figure but since he met many famous people including kings and writers his memoir has become a 80
- Car manufacturers and governments have been eagerly seeking a replacement for the automobile s main source of power the internal combustion engine By far the most promising alternative source of energy for cars is the hydrogen based fuel cell engine which 85
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement In twenty years there will be fewer cars in use than there are today Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 63
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Always telling the truth is the most important consideration in any relationship between people Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 60
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Television advertising directed towards young children aged two to five should not be allowed Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 60
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, moreover, nonetheless, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.4613686534 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 5.04856512141 158% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 7.30242825607 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 12.0772626932 50% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 22.412803532 54% => OK
Preposition: 17.0 30.3222958057 56% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 1.0 5.01324503311 20% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 969.0 1373.03311258 71% => OK
No of words: 176.0 270.72406181 65% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.50568181818 5.08290768461 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.64232057368 4.04702891845 90% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62127712194 2.5805825403 102% => OK
Unique words: 114.0 145.348785872 78% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.647727272727 0.540411800872 120% => OK
syllable_count: 288.9 419.366225166 69% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 13.0662251656 54% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 21.2450331126 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.0468210996 49.2860985944 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 138.428571429 110.228320801 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.1428571429 21.698381199 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.57142857143 7.06452816374 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.158295228273 0.272083759551 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0719726454051 0.0996497079465 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0533927406931 0.0662205650399 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.09595666312 0.162205337803 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0482848638984 0.0443174109184 109% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.1 13.3589403974 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 53.8541721854 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 11.0289183223 118% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.97 12.2367328918 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.27 8.42419426049 110% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 63.6247240618 77% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.498013245 114% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.