Whether physical fitness on is actually the only ingredient necessary to reach major achievements in sport competion is up for debate. Many claim that other factors play a role in reaching high levels in competitions. A long tradition that can be traced back to ancient civilitations underline the importance of a strong mental attitude as a tremendous weapon that can lead to extraordinary permormances. There is no doubt that athlets should work on their physical condition: runners have to train their bodies and their legs in order to cover long distances. Boxers have to lift weights and do endless, painful series of sit-ups. Football players have to develop muscles to jump high, to run fast and to kick the ball most precisely as the can.
As we can see, the list could go on and on but there is something essential that has not been considered. No matter which sport one is playing or what muscles is working on: the attitude one plays, runs or fights with can make the difference between victory and defeat, success and lost, fame and shame. The mind should be regarded and consequently trained as a muscle. Focusing on the match, studying the opponents, overcoming the fear are part of a successful result. For ggod reason therefore, it has been said that the mind is the most powerful weapon a human can rely on.
You can put together the best team, with the best players in the best physical condition but without an ecceptional mental attitude this compound of muscles, talent and skills may be not sufficient to face up to a determined, focused opponent. How tricherous this aspect could be, it can be seen in many football matches, where teams thoguht as invincible lost miserably against low ranked opponents. It is no surprise therefore that nowadays mental coaching has become a firm component in the training programs.
In conclusion, although most of the time and energy should be allocated to shape the physical condition, athlets should also reserve part of the time to develop a focused, strong mental attitude which can support them during some diffcult moments they may have to face during a competition.
- The best way to reduce crime among young people is to teach parents good parenting skills To what extent do you agree with this statement Give your own opinion and examples 89
- the growth of online shopping will one day lead to all shops in towns and cities closing do you agree or disagree 89
- Modern children are suffered from the diseases that were once considered to be meant for adults only Obesity is a major disease prevalent in children What are its causes and what solution can be offered 84
- Junk food advertising has a harmful effect on society and should be banned To what extent do you agree or disagree 95
- It is often argued that children must be protected from unsuitable material on tv and internet by government censorship Others say that it is the parents responsibility to control what their children do and watch To what extent do you think that this is 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 136, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun claim seems to be countable; consider using: 'Many claims'.
Suggestion: Many claims
...ts in sport competion is up for debate. Many claim that other factors play a role in reach...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 328, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... be seen in many football matches, where teams thoguht as invincible lost misera...
^^
Line 5, column 362, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... where teams thoguht as invincible lost miserably against low ranked opponents. ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, consequently, if, may, so, therefore, in conclusion, no doubt
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 7.85571142285 216% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1779.0 1615.20841683 110% => OK
No of words: 361.0 315.596192385 114% => OK
Chars per words: 4.92797783934 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.35889894354 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70323495545 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 210.0 176.041082164 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.581717451524 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 538.2 506.74238477 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 62.4563847817 49.4020404114 126% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.6 106.682146367 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0666666667 20.7667163134 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.46666666667 7.06120827912 77% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.149982193705 0.244688304435 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0438681844032 0.084324248473 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0427200516922 0.0667982634062 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0880462732214 0.151304729494 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0271985506078 0.056905535591 48% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 50.2224549098 111% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.61 12.4159519038 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.76 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 78.4519038076 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.