Most countries have locked down themselves in order to prevent the proliferation of coronavirus. Is it a positive or negative development?
It is true that a large number of nations have allowed only restricted movements by means of locking down, to reduce the spread of coronavirus. While some people see this as a positive development, I see this as a negative one and will present my arguments against it.
Those who support lockdown may argue that it is the best way to control the spread and save lives. They also mention that the government has put a restriction only on physical movement and not on actual work. For example, people are allowed to work from home and earn their livelihood. In case, this movement is allowed people will come in contact with each other and it will be difficult to control the spread. Hence, this lockdown definitely makes sense.
In my view, lockdown is not an option and governments should look at a holistic view. Putting people inside their homes is like putting them in jail. A lot of people lost their jobs since they could not travel to their workplace and a lot more businesses are getting closed since they don't have work or funds to pay their employees. As a typical case, we can look at a daily wage earner, a porter on a railway station, who is out of business and will not have enough savings to last this lockdown. Do governments have enough funds to feed everyone in the country, until coronavirus gets sorted out, probably not. So, they should look at alternative means to tackle this problem.
Moreover, this lockdown is also taking a toll on an individual's health. For instance, many people who used to go for a morning walk are confined to their homes, and in turn, now their physical health and immunity will anyway go down. Similarly, small children who used to play in parks in the evening are now settled with Television/Gaming sets. As a result, this locking down of cities will result in making people weak physically and psychologically.
In conclusion, despite the government's intention of saving people's lives via locking down, I believe that it is a big negative step and will have long-lasting impacts since people will either die from hunger or will have other health issues, if not from coronavirus.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-08-22 | atulmovie29 | 78 | view |
- You missed an international flight due to a problem at the airport Write a letter to the airline In your letter Describe what happened that caused you to miss your flight Explain how missing your flight impacted you Clearly state what you would like the a 87
- Some people think it is good to raise children in a city Others argue that it is better for children to grow up in the countryside Discuss both views and give your opinion 84
- Individuals can do nothing to improve the environment only governments and large companies can make a difference To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- The only way to reduce the amount of traffic in cities is by reducing the need for people to travel from home for work education or shopping To what extent do you agree or disagree 61
- Most countries have locked down themselves in order to prevent the proliferation of coronavirus Is it a positive or negative development 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 17, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
It is true that a large number of nations have allowed only restricted mo...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 286, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...usinesses are getting closed since they dont have work or funds to pay their employe...
^^^^
Line 7, column 53, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'individuals'' or 'individual's'?
Suggestion: individuals'; individual's
...is lockdown is also taking a toll on an individuals health. For instance, many people who u...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 28, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'governments'' or 'government's'?
Suggestion: governments'; government's
...ogically. In conclusion, despite the governments intention of saving peoples lives via l...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, anyway, hence, if, look, may, moreover, similarly, so, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, as a result, in my view, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 24.0651302605 145% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 54.0 41.998997996 129% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1773.0 1615.20841683 110% => OK
No of words: 371.0 315.596192385 118% => OK
Chars per words: 4.77897574124 5.12529762239 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.38877662729 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6574987772 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 204.0 176.041082164 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.549865229111 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 545.4 506.74238477 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 5.43587174349 202% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.8197254973 49.4020404114 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.5 106.682146367 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6111111111 20.7667163134 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.05555555556 7.06120827912 114% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.113383926189 0.244688304435 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0344871123614 0.084324248473 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0514426695873 0.0667982634062 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.081790723534 0.151304729494 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0637654452459 0.056905535591 112% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 13.0946893788 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 50.2224549098 119% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.44 12.4159519038 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.74 8.58950901804 90% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 78.4519038076 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.