It is better to have lots of friends than it is to have just a few friends

Friends have always played an important role in the life of each individual. Personally, I believe that it is better to have solely a couple of friends. I feel this way for two main reasons which I will explore in the following essay.

First of all, having only a few friends enables the person to get to know them very well ,and therefore ,develop stronger relationships with them. In other words, when you have many friends it is more difficult to determine who of them is reliable and who is not. However, when you are surrounded only by a couple of friends you can be sure that all of them are trustworthy. For example, several years ago, when I was still in college I had numerous friends. In spite of the fact that they were plenty, when I seeked for support during a difficult time most of them disappeared so as not to me. On the other hand, as I got older, I started to have only two or three friends. Nevertheless, when I was desperately seeking advice since I could not solve a personal problem on my own all of them helped me. As a result, I realized that it is better to have some reliable friends rather than numerous friends who cannot be trusted.

Secondly, the fewer friends someone has the less distractive they are. To be more specific, when you are friends with many people at the same time not only will you be required to dedicate more time to talk to all of them or to be with them in general but you will also have more people bother you. As a result, you will be unable to concentrate on the important tasks of your everyday life, such as your work or studies. My personal experience is a compelling example of this. Back in my student life I used to have so many friends that it was hard for me to even retain the names of all of them in my memory. Needless to say that I always had someone call me or invite me to attend a party or some other kind of event. Consequently, I was unable to focus neither on my assignments nor the upcoming exams and I neglected my studies so as to spend time with my friends which resulted in my failing to graduate in time.

In conclusion, I am of the opinion that having only a few good friends is more preferable. This is because it makes it easier to develop mutual trust and there will be fewer people to disturb and distract you.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 89, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...the person to get to know them very well ,and therefore ,develop stronger relation...
^^
Line 3, column 104, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...et to know them very well ,and therefore ,develop stronger relationships with them...
^^
Line 3, column 591, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...me most of them disappeared so as not to me. On the other hand, as I got older, I...
^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...umerous friends who cannot be trusted. Secondly, the fewer friends someone has ...
^^^
Line 5, column 834, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
...coming exams and I neglected my studies so as to spend time with my friends which result...
^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ed in my failing to graduate in time. In conclusion, I am of the opinion that ...
^^^
Line 7, column 211, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...wer people to disturb and distract you.
^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, however, if, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, still, therefore, well, as to, for example, i feel, in conclusion, in general, kind of, such as, as a result, first of all, in other words, in spite of, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 15.1003584229 159% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 18.0 11.0286738351 163% => OK
Pronoun: 67.0 43.0788530466 156% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 60.0 52.1666666667 115% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 8.0752688172 12% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1873.0 1977.66487455 95% => OK
No of words: 434.0 407.700716846 106% => OK
Chars per words: 4.31566820276 4.8611393121 89% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.56428161445 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.47255207666 2.67179642975 93% => OK
Unique words: 204.0 212.727598566 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.470046082949 0.524837075471 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 603.0 618.680645161 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 9.0 3.51792114695 256% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.2884971875 48.9658058833 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.65 100.406767564 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.7 20.6045352989 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.55 5.45110844103 230% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.5376344086 126% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 11.8709677419 126% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.275589216964 0.236089414692 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.101181258962 0.076458572812 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.110376062479 0.0737576698707 150% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.198074469533 0.150856017488 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0502488133266 0.0645574589148 78% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.8 11.7677419355 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 58.1214874552 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.1575268817 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 7.78 10.9000537634 71% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.41 8.01818996416 92% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 86.8835125448 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.

So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:

reasons == advantages or

reasons == disadvantages

for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.


Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.