Nowadays, many movies or films are based on books. Some people prefer to read the original book before they watch the movie, others prefer to watch the movie before reading the book. Which one do you prefer?
In today's modern and sophisticated world, countless movies are based on books. In this connection, there are several preferences about whether to watch movies or read books. Although contested by many that the matter of reading books before watching movies, which are directed based on origin books, is highly beneficial, such an issue is regarded as both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I concur with the notion that it is helpful when people watch films before reading books, and I will analyze my reasons throughout this essay.
First, people can grasp the detail of a story by watching films, so it helps people to recall an exact story while they are reading a book in the future. To be more specific, movies are full of exciting scenes with elaborated data; thus, when people read a book of that story, they can imagine each sentence preciously. According to my own experience, I watched Anakarnina three years ago, which is based on a popular book. The film showed houses and dresses wonderfully so I could not forget scenes, and they have transferred to my long-term memory. Last week, I started to read the original book of Anakarnina. Although I watched the movie a few years ago, I could picture the information which was presented in the book impressively; hence, I had a pleasant time while reading a book.
Second, one should dedicate a tremendous amount of time to reading a book; however, they can watch a movie in a short time. To elucidate, people are busy nowadays, so they look for a convenient way to realize a story. Therefore, they prefer to acquire knowledge in a way that does not dissipate their time. For example, I allocated nearly one month to reading the blindness book, but the blindness movie is for two hours. As a result, watching a movie saves people time as it is limited to two or three hours. Moreover, one can watch a movie, which needs a short time, before reading a book to get insight into a story, and if they like a story, they will dedicate their time to read it.
To conclude, while there are several arguments on each side, I profoundly believe that it is efficient to watch a film before reading a book. Not only does a movie have memorable scenes, but it also saves one's time.
- Essay topics TPO 46 Integrated Writing Task 70
- Which way do you think is the best for a student to make new friends Joining a sports team Participate in community activities Traveling 76
- Grades encourage students to work harder at school Do you agree or disagree Use specific reasons and examples to support your opinion 76
- Are government doing well in educating people to pay attention to the importance of the food nutrition and healthy eating 86
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement The most important way to improve people s health is to clean the environment 83
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 206, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...ave memorable scenes, but it also saves ones time.
^^^^
Line 7, column 217, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...le scenes, but it also saves ones time.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, however, if, look, moreover, second, so, therefore, thus, while, for example, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 36.0 43.0788530466 84% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 52.1666666667 88% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1874.0 1977.66487455 95% => OK
No of words: 397.0 407.700716846 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.72040302267 4.8611393121 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.46372701284 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61830521713 2.67179642975 98% => OK
Unique words: 195.0 212.727598566 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.491183879093 0.524837075471 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 597.6 618.680645161 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.86738351254 268% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.5389197267 48.9658058833 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.111111111 100.406767564 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0555555556 20.6045352989 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.33333333333 5.45110844103 116% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.532631576026 0.236089414692 226% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.17020889609 0.076458572812 223% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0698063516335 0.0737576698707 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.332356474311 0.150856017488 220% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0431739441889 0.0645574589148 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 11.7677419355 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 58.1214874552 99% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.1 10.9000537634 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.11 8.01818996416 101% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 86.8835125448 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.