Many people believe that in order to have clean and tidy streets in their neighbourhood, this should be the residents’ responsibility, while others think it should be the government’s duty. What is your opinion?
In today’s world, most countries have shown great concern about the pollution in the streets. When this issue comes into views, there exists many conflicting opinions. Some people strongly agree that cleaning the streets is the task of residents. Meanwhile, others share the view that this is the responsibility of governments. Both of the views have their own merits which require careful consideration.
On the one hand, some people support the view that tidying streets is the task of government. This is because the government received a large sum of money paid for cleaning tax from citizens. According to the Litter and the Law article, the cost to the taxpayers in the UK for street cleaning is over £1 billion a year. Therefore, the government should take actions to deserve the number of money they accepted for this issue.
On the other hand, some argue that residents may be in charge of cleaning their streets. One explanation to support this point is that people dumped a large amount of rubbish into their streets every day. In reality, official reports indicate that more than 2 million pieces of litter are discharged in the road of residential areas in the UK every day. Obviously, the bulk of rubbish in the streets arises from the activities of residents. Consequently, people should take responsibility for their actions.
Given the aforementioned points, it may be concluded that cleaning the streets is not only the task of individuals but also governments. However, from my perspective, I share the opinion that in this field, the duty of citizens dominates this of governments.
- The bar charts and line graph below show the results of a survey conducted over a three year period to discover what people who live in London think of the city Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons wh 67
- The charts below show one government s spending on culture and education in 1995 and 2005 and the number of people participating in Arts events in the same year Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons wh 75
- Some people think that one of the best ways to solve environmental problems is to increase the cost of fuel for cars and other vehicles To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- Earlier technological developments brought more benefits and changed the lives of ordinary people more than recent technological developments To what extent do you agree or disagree Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your 84
- Nowadays we can see definite sign of surplus production in almost every industry sector and thus is leading to environmental damage What are the some possible solution to this situation 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, however, may, so, therefore, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 10.4138276553 19% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1347.0 1615.20841683 83% => OK
No of words: 265.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.08301886792 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03470204552 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82004723885 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 143.0 176.041082164 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.539622641509 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 398.7 506.74238477 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 23.5076450331 49.4020404114 48% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 84.1875 106.682146367 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.5625 20.7667163134 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.875 7.06120827912 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.324420775725 0.244688304435 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0957807188748 0.084324248473 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.054643806217 0.0667982634062 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.179920665395 0.151304729494 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0253740685771 0.056905535591 45% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 13.0946893788 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 50.2224549098 127% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 11.3001002004 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.89 12.4159519038 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.83 8.58950901804 91% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 78.4519038076 73% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 9.78957915832 56% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.