The best test of an argument is the argument's ability to convince someone with an opposing viewpoint.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
An argument is the statement that can be argued with others, and I mostly agree that convincing someone with an opposing viewpoint is suitable for verify an argument. However, in certain circumstances, there is no need to convince with others for argument verification.
Admittedly, we can clarify an argument through discussion with people who hold opposite opinions. Furthermore, people tend to provide evidences and experiment results to persuade others. For instance, all of the president candidates would debate in public during the election season in Taiwan. Most of the time, the voters tend to be neutral because they may feel confused about the policies proposed by those candidates. However, the voters can have better understanding about those politic statements when candidates argue with each other from the different perspectives in public or TV live show. Thus, an valid argument can convince someone with opposing viewpoints.
On the other hand, there still remain some arguments do not need to convince someone through opposing viewpoint. In other words, some concepts can be totally believe from others without providing supporting details, for example religion. To be frankly, people find their religious believes based on the spiritual experience during worship. They visit temples or churches periodically to calm their complex mind and thoughts. It is religion which make them believe in themselves and share happiness with others. In addition, it in not necessary to provide any facts and opposing viewpoints to convince their belief in god. In these circumstances, the concepts of a belief would not need any opposing viewpoint to strengthen the position of the argument.
In conclusion, based on the discussion above mentioned, I agree that an valid argument in most of the cases, like policy, can convince someone with an opposing viewpoint. However, my position excludes the argument in all of the religions because people can accept the concept of spirit without verifying it.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-20 | Dipesh1234 | 50 | view |
| 2023-08-11 | okazaki11 | 66 | view |
| 2023-07-27 | KalyaniHarbola | 79 | view |
| 2022-07-06 | fortune | 66 | view |
| 2022-06-02 | OkwyUwadoka | 58 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement All university students should be required to take history courses no matter what their field of study is Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 81
- Glass is a favored building material for modern architecture yet it is also very dangerous for wild birds Because they often cannot distinguish between glass and open air millions of birds are harmed every year when they try to fly through glass windows T 65
- Some people argue that successful leaders in government industry or other fields must be highly competitive Other people claim that in order to be successful a leader must be willing and able to cooperate with others Write a response in which you discuss 50
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Movies and television have more negative effects than positive effects on the way young people behave Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 66
- Imagine that you are in a classroom or a meeting The teacher or the meeting leader says something incorrect In your opinion which of the following is the best thing to do Interrupt and correct the mistake right away Wait until the class or meeting is over 60
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 202, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...sults to persuade others. For instance, all of the president candidates would debate in pu...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 607, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...ctives in public or TV live show. Thus, an valid argument can convince someone wit...
^^
Line 8, column 1, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...ngthen the position of the argument. In conclusion, based on the discussion abo...
^^
Line 8, column 70, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...iscussion above mentioned, I agree that an valid argument in most of the cases, li...
^^
Line 8, column 218, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...r, my position excludes the argument in all of the religions because people can accept the...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
frankly, furthermore, however, if, may, so, still, then, thus, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, in other words, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 19.5258426966 41% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 12.4196629213 105% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 14.8657303371 47% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.3162921348 53% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 33.0505617978 61% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 58.6224719101 94% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 12.9106741573 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1705.0 2235.4752809 76% => OK
No of words: 313.0 442.535393258 71% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.44728434505 5.05705443957 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20616286096 4.55969084622 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83117932244 2.79657885939 101% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 215.323595506 78% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.533546325879 0.4932671777 108% => OK
syllable_count: 524.7 704.065955056 75% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.38483146067 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.2370786517 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 18.0 23.0359550562 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.4158035775 60.3974514979 50% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 100.294117647 118.986275619 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.4117647059 23.4991977007 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.88235294118 5.21951772744 170% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 7.80617977528 64% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 10.2758426966 68% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 5.13820224719 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.317262650062 0.243740707755 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.112080625303 0.0831039109588 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.116313089367 0.0758088955206 153% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.23772156075 0.150359130593 158% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0963620517569 0.0667264976115 144% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 14.1392134831 95% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 48.8420337079 92% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.1743820225 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.33 12.1639044944 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.62 8.38706741573 103% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 100.480337079 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 11.2143820225 82% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.