This report derives from the Pie chart, which illustrates online sales for important retail goods in Canada in 2005 & 2010. The diagram represented the electronic & appliances, food & beverages, home goods, and video games in four parts with varying percentages.
Generally speaking, in 2005, electronics & appliance projected a higher percentage as video games gain the lowest. In 2010, food & beverages mushroomed online sales, while home furnishing pertained to the lowest.
In 2005, the electronics & appliances gained 35% online sales; however, sales in 2010 decreased slightly to 30%. The online sales of video games in 2005 emphasize to 18%, but after five years it surges to 23%. Overall, the online sales percentage of electronics & appliance and video games were equal when they added in 2005 & 2010.
The online sales varied in some goods, and there was a dramatic fluctuation in between the percentages. Although in 2005, the food & beverages pertained 22% online sales, there was a tremendous change in 2010, which showed a difference of 10% between them. In opposite, the online sales of home furnishing were 25% in 2005, but it downgraded to 15% in 2010. The sum of percentages in 2005 & 2010 of food & beverages and home furnishing were equal.
- The graph below shows the population figures of different types of turtles in India between 1980 and 2012 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 56
- The diagram below shows how instant noodles are manufactured Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 56
- The table below shows how young people in Tokyo Japan listened to music over the previous month The pie chart shows a record company s international findings about whether people preferred live or recorded music Summarize the information by selecting and 11
- The charts below shows the reasons why people travel to work by bicycle or by car Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 59
- The charts below show the main reasons for study among students of different age groups and the amount of support they received from employers Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Write 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1056.0 965.302439024 109% => OK
No of words: 200.0 196.424390244 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.28 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76060309309 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81382513911 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 103.0 106.607317073 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.515 0.547539520022 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 307.8 283.868780488 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.482926829268 828% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 18.3852258329 43.030603864 43% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 96.0 112.824112599 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.1818181818 22.9334400587 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.45454545455 5.23603664747 47% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.204988839329 0.215688989381 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0958618928892 0.103423049105 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.073503577082 0.0843802449381 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.137380587457 0.15604864568 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0497541862808 0.0819641961636 61% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.05 11.4140731707 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.32 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 40.7170731707 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.