The first graph details the statistical information on how much money was invested(in pounds) by parents in kids' sports activities in Britain over a period of 6 years from 2008 to 2014, while the second graph reveals the number of participants( in millions) in football, Athletics, and Swimming within the same time bracket.
Looking from the overall perspective, it is readily apparent that over the period as a whole, the average spendings rose significantly. Moreover, the majority of the participants were recorded in Football.
According to the given illustration, the average spending began at 20 pounds in 2008. However, the same went up to a peak of approximately 32 pounds by the period end, a noticeable change of about 12 pounds over the entire period.
Turning to the other chart, nearly 8 million children opted for Football compared to just 2.3 million swimmers, and only a million athletes in 2008. Moving on, by 2011, whilst athletes surpassed the swimmers to reach 5 million by the period end as against 4 million swimmers, the football continued to witness a substantial surge to finally climb at 9 million, which was just close to the double of the athletes' number.
- The tourism industry has grown enormously over the last fifty years and there are few places that are unaffected by it However tourism rarely benefits the countries which tourists visit To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- Some students tend to play computer games rather than do sports Why is this What can be done to tackle the problem 95
- The charts below give information about the electricity generation in the two countries in 2009 73
- The first chart below gives information about the money spent by British parents on their children s sports between 2008 and 2014 The second chart shows the number of children who participated in three sports in Britain over the same time period 78
- The bar chart below shows the proportions of English men and women of different ages who were living alone in 2011 The pie chart compares the numbers of bedrooms in this one person households 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, however, if, look, moreover, second, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 995.0 965.302439024 103% => OK
No of words: 197.0 196.424390244 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.05076142132 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.74642080493 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85870190069 2.65546596893 108% => OK
Unique words: 123.0 106.607317073 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.624365482234 0.547539520022 114% => OK
syllable_count: 288.9 283.868780488 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 22.4926829268 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 86.4038925805 43.030603864 201% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 142.142857143 112.824112599 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.1428571429 22.9334400587 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.28571428571 5.23603664747 158% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.231019943131 0.215688989381 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0886292636831 0.103423049105 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0836657194708 0.0843802449381 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.126139840238 0.15604864568 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0902757827857 0.0819641961636 110% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 13.2329268293 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.52 61.2550243902 84% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.3012195122 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.31 11.4140731707 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.11 8.06136585366 113% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 40.7170731707 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 11.4329268293 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.9970731707 120% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.