Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they cast doubt on the specific theories mentioned in the reading passage.
One of the attraction subject through the sea is construction artificial reefs that is under debate. I the lecture talks about the advantages of building and releasing this artificial reefs to the sea but in the lecture professor point out some drawbacks of this kinds reefs.
The first statement of article states about artificial reefs can develop and increase the competiveness ability of small-fisher compared to large competitor. Small fisher can make this reefs in unknown or secret place to advocate their professional career and their community for burgeoning their economic. Conversely, in the lecture professor completely disagree with reading because of following reason. Speaker stated that this idea not comprehensive in due to can caused to insecurity and increase the illegal construction of reefs in unknown place. It is better small-fisher informed public to this reefs in order to maintain and security of their reefs.
Artificial reefs can cause the increase the attraction of fish and other marine creature on it. Different marine will take place on this type of reefs and will be cause the increasing of marine population on their community in location. In the lecture repudiate this advantage of artificial reefs by compelling explanation. Artificial reefs do not increase on fish population while actually they disturb of inhabitant by instability of equilibrium of community.
In the article stated that artificial reefs can increase the using of recycle material that would not use for other application or purpose. Artificial reefs can construct by some outdated car and other objects that is hard to recycle or dispose. These material can be used as a cheap, environment-friendly application. The speaker says that this not a good way or not pragmatic to reuse of this material as reefs in the sea. To put in another way, this maybe cause to destruction of environment or marine habitats by release of chemical toxin and dislocate of some creature in the storm condition.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-12-07 | amyabt | 70 | view |
| 2020-10-07 | Maziyeh Khavari1390 | 60 | view |
| 2020-10-07 | Maziyeh Khavari1390 | 3 | view |
- A university recognized first year students have poor study skills in its university Some in the university believe the best way to address this is to ask all first year students have to pass course on study skills Others don t agree with this requirement 60
- Summarize the points about Artificial reefs in the lecture being sure to explain how they cast doubt on the specific theories mentioned in the reading passage 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement The most important goal of education is to teach people how to educate themselves 73
- bb 3
- do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Because of modern life is very complex. it is essential for young people to have the ability to plan and organize. use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 90
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 259, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...e professor point out some drawbacks of this kinds reefs. The first statement of a...
^^^^
Line 2, column 600, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
... better small-fisher informed public to this reefs in order to maintain and security...
^^^^
Line 3, column 161, Rule ID: BE_CAUSE[1]
Message: Did you mean 'because'?
Suggestion: because
...ke place on this type of reefs and will be cause the increasing of marine population on ...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, conversely, first, if, may, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 15.1003584229 40% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 13.8261648746 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.0286738351 54% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 26.0 43.0788530466 60% => OK
Preposition: 57.0 52.1666666667 109% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.0752688172 186% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1684.0 1977.66487455 85% => OK
No of words: 320.0 407.700716846 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.2625 4.8611393121 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22948505376 4.48103885553 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02280395494 2.67179642975 113% => OK
Unique words: 154.0 212.727598566 72% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.48125 0.524837075471 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 538.2 618.680645161 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.59856630824 42% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.51792114695 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6003584229 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.5890094642 48.9658058833 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.25 100.406767564 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 20.6045352989 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.25 5.45110844103 60% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 11.8709677419 59% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0457289603289 0.236089414692 19% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0204953603408 0.076458572812 27% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0301181850288 0.0737576698707 41% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0356923264932 0.150856017488 24% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0199582966254 0.0645574589148 31% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 11.7677419355 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 58.1214874552 74% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.1575268817 121% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.23 10.9000537634 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.38 8.01818996416 105% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 86.8835125448 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 10.002688172 125% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.