A person’s worth nowadays seems to be judged according to social status and material possessions. Old-fashioned values, such as honour, kindness and trust, no longer seem important.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
Social Media have been influencing the masses to follow the trending culture and outfits. People nowadays prefer sharing their activities accompanying their latest attire to attract more viewership. This mindset of showing off to the followers has created an illusion that the society accepts the materialistic values rather than the character of a person. The argument, that the material possession is not admirable then the personal value is discussed below.
Firstly, the online social media platforms for example Facebook, Instagram, Snapchat, etc. have lots of models who showcase their outfits which are sponsored by the marketing team of respective brands. Since mobile has become a handy device, research shows that the marketing budget has now shifted from television to online platforms. It is quite uncertain that they have the ownership of those items. So one should not get judgemental about the possession of such products.
Secondly, few people just love to travel, moreover with the help of the internet, they are making money out of air. But behind that videos or photos, there is a lot of dedication of there time along with dexterous hard work. One should try to learn the skills and knowledge they share, instead of getting jealousy or attraction towards their material possession. By showing off such products they make money from the brands.
On the contrary, few people run behind the people who hold the costlier objects. Such mundane thinkers can never be successful in their career aspects. They think owning such object makes them look rich and are accepted by society; somehow if they manage to purchase those items, they come in financial troubles if not planned properly. For example, buying the costliest car in the market on loan will subsequently make your account deficit leading to financial problems.
To sum up, with the people who hold the paramount products are the one who has struggled to make their dream come true. One must try to learn the moral values of the person who holds the ownership of such highly valuable goods and develop themselves to achieve their dreams instead of imitating others.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-10-11 | parabshreyas | 89 | view |
| 2019-11-16 | Ghada Khalid | 81 | view |
| 2019-11-10 | Ahmed karem Mahmoud Ahmed | 92 | view |
- Your local council is considering closing a sports and leisure centre that it runs in order to save money Write a letter to the local council In your letter give details of how you and your friends or family use the centre explain why the sports and leisu 89
- Although you have never formally studied computing you have always been interested in computers You have just read about a computer course that really interests you but it is only for people who have completed an elementary course Write a letter to the co 73
- In many places new homes are needed but the only space available for building them is in the countryside Some people believe it is more important to protect the countryside and not build new homes there What is your opinion about this Give reasons for you 73
- You should spend about 40 minutes on this task Countries around the world will be facing significant challenges relating not only to the environment but population and education as well What problems will your country face in the next ten years How can th 61
- You have seen an advertisement in an Australian magazine for someone to live with a family for six months and look after their six year old child Write a letter to the parents In your letter Explain why you would like the job Give details of why you would 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, if, look, moreover, second, secondly, so, then, for example, on the contrary, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1804.0 1615.20841683 112% => OK
No of words: 349.0 315.596192385 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.16905444126 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32221490584 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51283353898 2.80592935109 90% => OK
Unique words: 211.0 176.041082164 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.604584527221 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 538.2 506.74238477 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.5014727953 49.4020404114 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.9473684211 106.682146367 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.3684210526 20.7667163134 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.68421052632 7.06120827912 80% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0984861547772 0.244688304435 40% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0320336567836 0.084324248473 38% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0299614897937 0.0667982634062 45% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0562142460439 0.151304729494 37% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0262692934579 0.056905535591 46% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 50.2224549098 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.55 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 111.0 78.4519038076 141% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.