The charts below show local government expenditure in 2010 and 2015.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The pie charts illustrate about the data of expenditures of the local government in the time of 2010 and 2015.
Overall, the graphs provide the proportion of spending money on the nine sectors by local government, where, the percentage of interest on borrowing had become double in 2015. However, the amount of expenditure on all sectors had decreased in 2015 except transportation and interest on borrowing.
Turning to the pie chart of 2010, where, its indicated that education was the highest money consumption field at 24%. Followed by, health care and pension were also the more costly field than others which stood at 20% and 19% respectively. In contrast, transport, culture and leisure and other sectors were being less expense by the local authority and the proportion were similar for these three. Moreover, the spending on welfare and interest on borrow were 8% and 5% respectively.
In 2015, we can see that, the government expenditure had been increasing in welfare and interest on borrowing at 13% and 10% respectively. Though, again education (21%) was the highest money spending sector for local authority and health care (20%) was in second position. On the other hand, less expenditure also in 2015 were on transportation, cultural and leisure and only 1% money were spending on these categories. While, cost for pension was reaming same according to 2010.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-10-26 | hien3112 | 78 | view |
| 2024-10-26 | Giang Tran | 73 | view |
| 2024-10-26 | Giang Tran | 84 | view |
| 2024-10-25 | hien3112 | 67 | view |
| 2024-10-20 | hahoaan | 84 | view |
- The bar chart below gives information about the percentage of the population living in urban areas in different parts of the world Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 56
- The charts below show local government expenditure in 2010 and 2015 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- The graph below shows radio and television audiences throughout the day in 1992 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 77
- Some people work for the same organisation all their working life Others think it is better to work for different organisations Discuss both these views and give your own opinion Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own 56
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activity in 2010 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, moreover, second, so, while, in contrast, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 6.8 206% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 3.97073170732 277% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1150.0 965.302439024 119% => OK
No of words: 224.0 196.424390244 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.13392857143 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.86867284054 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84999104904 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 117.0 106.607317073 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.522321428571 0.547539520022 95% => OK
syllable_count: 343.8 283.868780488 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.7579190905 43.030603864 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.545454545 112.824112599 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3636363636 22.9334400587 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.72727272727 5.23603664747 128% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 3.70975609756 216% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.158735461195 0.215688989381 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0722252490846 0.103423049105 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0732180246716 0.0843802449381 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.136860994456 0.15604864568 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0829067606613 0.0819641961636 101% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 61.2550243902 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.47 11.4140731707 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.87 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.