The parents of children who suffer from obesity should receive punishment for allowing them to become overweight. This essay disagrees with this statement because obesity can be caused by genetics and children often eat unhealthy food outside of the home.
Firstly, childhood obesity is strongly linked to genetic and hereditary aspects, which are the main reasons contributing to obese children. In fact, it is abundantly obvious that genetic factors are involved in the regulation of body weight and in determining individual responses to diet and exercise. A study of Genome-wide Association Studies revealed that specific chromosomes play a serious role in pediatric setting and that shedding light on the genetic architecture of childhood obesity would facilitate the treatment of this disease. As a result, DNA and genetics are the main source of childhood obesity.
Secondly, parents are not present when children consume most of their food. When children are at school eat snacks and have lunch and the adults have no control over their dietary intake during this time. A child could consume the vast majority of their calories during these unsupervised periods, without their mother and father’s knowledge or permission, and much of this intake could take the form of junk food. A recent study found that primary school students consume an average of 75% of their daily recommended calorific allowance during school hours.
In conclusion, in my personal point of view, parents are not predominantly responsible for making their children fat. Genetic reasons and the absence of parents during the consumption of specific daily meals as well are the main contributors of childhood obesity.
- Lack of fresh water is becoming a global issue of increasing importance What problems does this shortage cause What measures could be taken to overcome these problems 96
- Some cities create housing areas by providing taller buildings Others create housing by building houses on a wider area of land What solution is better 84
- The internet has changed the way we communicate Much communication todayhappens through social media 89
- Prevention is better than cure Researching and treating diseases is too costly so it would be better to invest in preventative measures To what extent do you agree 89
- The diagram below shows the process of recycling glass bottles
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, well, in conclusion, in fact, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1444.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 266.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.42857142857 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03850299372 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75599552516 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.59022556391 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 447.3 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.3219410455 49.4020404114 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.333333333 106.682146367 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1666666667 20.7667163134 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.33333333333 7.06120827912 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.298509768205 0.244688304435 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.111639372217 0.084324248473 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.107256616523 0.0667982634062 161% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.187288636822 0.151304729494 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0929436613513 0.056905535591 163% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 13.0946893788 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.21 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.12 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 78.4519038076 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.