summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they contradict specific points made in the reading passage
The speaker in the lecture was trying to explain his contradiction with this idea that the Pluto is not a plant. These lecture is in contradiction with the passage.
First he mentioned that so many of astronomers do not agree this depletion since they believe that Pluto is the biggest germ in that area or have moons. This remark is against the passage idea that mention Pluto " does not dominate the region of it's orbit".
Second, the speaker claimed that the definition of International Astronomical Union about the planet should be change to revolve all the germs that can be a plant but have some objections. This idea is in contrary with rigid three criteria that mentioned in the passage.
Finally, lecturer implied that calling the Pluto dwarf planet is challenging because for 80 years we call it planet and changing this word is confusing. Also rewriting and rebuilding the data is cost and time consuming. Also this idea is an objection to the knowing Pluto as a dwarf planet.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-10-27 | Mohamad Mahdi | 60 | view |
| 2019-04-02 | edsonsimoes | 60 | view |
| 2016-01-12 | edsonsimoes | 90 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 112, Rule ID: SHOULD_BE_DO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'changed'?
Suggestion: changed
...omical Union about the planet should be change to revolve all the germs that can be a ...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 153, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...et and changing this word is confusing. Also rewriting and rebuilding the data is co...
^^^^
Line 4, column 220, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...ng the data is cost and time consuming. Also this idea is an objection to the knowin...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, second, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.4613686534 115% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 7.30242825607 68% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 12.0772626932 75% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 22.412803532 98% => OK
Preposition: 17.0 30.3222958057 56% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 6.0 5.01324503311 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 832.0 1373.03311258 61% => OK
No of words: 171.0 270.72406181 63% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.86549707602 5.08290768461 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.61617157096 4.04702891845 89% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6527929858 2.5805825403 103% => OK
Unique words: 102.0 145.348785872 70% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.59649122807 0.540411800872 110% => OK
syllable_count: 255.6 419.366225166 61% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 8.23620309051 24% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 2.5761589404 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 13.0662251656 69% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.0810140817 49.2860985944 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.4444444444 110.228320801 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0 21.698381199 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.11111111111 7.06452816374 58% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 4.33554083885 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0846287681065 0.272083759551 31% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0404832315058 0.0996497079465 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0432589493577 0.0662205650399 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0594037282032 0.162205337803 37% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0477897215992 0.0443174109184 108% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 13.3589403974 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 53.8541721854 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.0289183223 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.97 12.2367328918 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.46 8.42419426049 100% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 63.6247240618 66% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.7273730684 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.