The charts below show the percentage of men and women in different weight groups in England between 1993 and 2002.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The line charts illustrate the trends in proportion of males and females weight groups during the period of ten years, from 1993 to 2002.
Looking through the overall perspective, we can notice the predominance of overweighted women (equals to 48-49 %) over other groups of respondents during the whole period and changes in prevalence of overweighted men by the end of surveyed years.
It is apparent that almost a half of male population (47%) consisted of healthy weighted people in 1993. By the end of 1998, there was a moderate decline in this percentage ratio and during remaining part of the period the number of healthy weighted men dropped a bit under 40%. The level of overweighted male population had an opposite tendency; between 1993 and 2002 number of overweighted respondents gradually increased from 42% to 48%. Considering the remaining two groups of obese and dangerously obese men, their percentages correlate to 15% and 3% respectively in 2002.
Moving to the female respondents, the dangerously obese surveyed hold the lowest level, consisting just above 3% as in the first category of people. Group suffering from obesity has undergone the most changes: at the beginning of the period it was just one tenth of female population, in 1998 the number reached 19% and ended up the year keeping this level. Unfortunately, healthy weighted women have the same trend as male respondents, decreasing their quantity by 9% and closed the year contributing to 31% of population. In conclusion, it seems that whole population in England between 1993 and 2002 had a tendency to growth the proportion of overweighted people to healthy weighted ones.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-11-01 | Anastasia0511 | 73 | view |
- The diagram below shows how instant noodles are manufactured 78
- The pie chart below shows the main reasons why agricultural land becomes less productive The table shows how these causes affected three regions of the world during the 1990s Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make 84
- The charts below show the proportions of British students at one university in England who were able to speak other languages in 2000 and 2010 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The table below gives information about the problems faced by children in two primary schools in 2005 and 2015 73
- The line graph shows the size of the global population from 1400 to 2000 and the pie charts show the global population by region in 1900 and 2000 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, look, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 55.0 33.7804878049 163% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 3.97073170732 227% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1388.0 965.302439024 144% => OK
No of words: 270.0 196.424390244 137% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.14074074074 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05360046442 3.73543355544 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95019777118 2.65546596893 111% => OK
Unique words: 147.0 106.607317073 138% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.544444444444 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 410.4 283.868780488 145% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 37.4818622803 43.030603864 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 138.8 112.824112599 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.0 22.9334400587 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.1 5.23603664747 59% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.177618783814 0.215688989381 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0772186226785 0.103423049105 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0469016830425 0.0843802449381 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.111253448694 0.15604864568 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0500928001953 0.0819641961636 61% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.3 13.2329268293 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.53 61.2550243902 86% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.6 10.3012195122 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.83 11.4140731707 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.6 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 40.7170731707 152% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.