Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? My lifestyle is easier and more comfortable than the one my grandparents experienced when they were young. Use specific details and examples to support your answer.
The lifestyle these days and the way people lived in the past are dramatically different. I am of the opinion that people have a better lifestyle in my generation than my grandparents did. I feel this way for some reasons, which I will explore in the following essay.
First and foremost, benefiting from the development of technology, people have a highly convenient lifestyle nowadays. People have high-tech appliances and lots of useful facilities to make them live more comfortably. Consider some home appliances, for instance. Many families must have a vacuum cleaner, a washing machine, and a dishwasher in the house. Due to those implements, my mom can clean the house without paying too much effort, and wash clothes in a shorter time. The best part is that I do not need to argue with any of my family members to decide who is going to do the dishes. If I had not had those practical high-tech tools, my life would not have been that easy. Therefore, I think that people actually are having a convenient lifestyle, which was hard to imagine in the past.
Moreover, people care more about design, such as architecture, interior design, and the appearance of products. In contrast, most people in my grandparents’ time did not consider that aesthetics is important, and they did not have extra money to decorate their homes either. My growth surrounding can be a compelling illustration. My parents spent a great deal of money on interior design. The floor in my room is wooden, so the ground will not be so cold in the winter, and there are some plants by the window, so I can have a positive mood after waking up in the morning. Additionally, there are some specially designed storage cabinets that we can use the space properly and still keep the environment tidy. Thus, I think that people pay more attention to the living environment, and are willing to pay money for it to have a comfortable place to live.
In conclusion, I strongly believe that the quality of life recently is higher than people had in my grandparents’ generation. This is because we have high-tech equipment, and we concern more about domestic surroundings.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-04-28 | Eshovo | 73 | view |
| 2023-04-28 | Eshovo | 73 | view |
| 2023-04-28 | Eshovo | 73 | view |
| 2023-04-08 | prakriti malla | 70 | view |
| 2023-04-08 | prakriti malla | 76 | view |
- In order to attract more tourists the government could either improve safety by hiring more police or improve its appearance by repairing old buildings and streets Which way do you think is more effective 60
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Teachers should not make their social or political views known to students in the classroom Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement The most important things people learn are from families 70
- Ethanol fuel made from plants such as corn and sugar cane has been advocated by some people as an alternative to gasoline in the United States However many critics argue that ethanol is not a good replacement for gasoline for several reasons First the inc 88
- Summarize the points made in the lecture being sure to explain how they oppose the specific points made in the reading passage 85
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, first, if, moreover, so, still, therefore, thus, for instance, i feel, i think, in conclusion, in contrast, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 39.0 43.0788530466 91% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 52.1666666667 81% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1786.0 1977.66487455 90% => OK
No of words: 368.0 407.700716846 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.85326086957 4.8611393121 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37987740619 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90341021542 2.67179642975 109% => OK
Unique words: 204.0 212.727598566 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.554347826087 0.524837075471 106% => OK
syllable_count: 567.0 618.680645161 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 7.0 1.86738351254 375% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.94265232975 40% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.0689007748 48.9658058833 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.3 100.406767564 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.4 20.6045352989 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.25 5.45110844103 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.170643538738 0.236089414692 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0541187582513 0.076458572812 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0499354142315 0.0737576698707 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.115150527735 0.150856017488 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.021878322903 0.0645574589148 34% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 11.7677419355 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 58.1214874552 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.1575268817 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.85 10.9000537634 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.31 8.01818996416 104% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 86.8835125448 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.002688172 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.