In a number of countries, some people think it is necessary to spend large sums of money on contrusting new railways lines for very fast trains between cities. Others believe the money should be spent on improving existing public transport. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
Compared to the past, there was a huge amount of far travel needed which assist business travel and transiting international product. Therefore, demand of constructing railways are increasing over time period. However, from my radical vision, I believe that goverments should invest more in developing public transportation in order to enhance the living standard of occupations.
To begin with, as claimed by the advancement of sophisticated day, more and more faraway conveyance exists. Thus, the construction system of city received obligately requirement of building and expanding novel railways lines. If there are a drastical rise of railways lines, the habbitants will obtain a wide range of opportunities to travel to essential destination which affect significantly to their business issue or favorite traveling places. Furthermore, the risen of railways lines will evolve the economic standing and financial status of one city as well, since it accommodate the human beings with chance to impart individual products and innovate worldwide expenditures.
On the otherhand, instead of focusing only on long distance transportation, governments gain supplemental duty to develop public transport for the citizen. As can be seen, the increasing of motorcycles and cars create severe impact on environments problems and the exists of fatal cacbondioxide. For instance, appart from one motorcycles, it has potential abilities to make enormous consequence to green house gases and climate change. Subsequently, the leaders have to take conscientious action in order to reduce the amount of polution, more specific is pay attention to manufacture modern and technical transportation, make it appear widely in large communities to gain noticable awareness from citizens. In addition, public transport will help people travel effortlessly around their curent accomodation and enlarge relationships of society.
To conclude, although it is extremely crucial to pay a vast money for railways lines, there need to be several investment to mass transit.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 252, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'rises'?
Suggestion: rises
...ailways lines. If there are a drastical rise of railways lines, the habbitants will ...
^^^^
Line 7, column 54, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[3]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'vast money'.
Suggestion: vast money
...although it is extremely crucial to pay a vast money for railways lines, there need to be se...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 104, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun investment seems to be countable; consider using: 'several investments'.
Suggestion: several investments
...ey for railways lines, there need to be several investment to mass transit.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 140, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... be several investment to mass transit.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, if, so, therefore, thus, well, for instance, in addition, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 9.0 24.0651302605 37% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 41.998997996 121% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.3376753507 204% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1756.0 1615.20841683 109% => OK
No of words: 305.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.75737704918 5.12529762239 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17902490978 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.24951942781 2.80592935109 116% => OK
Unique words: 201.0 176.041082164 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.659016393443 0.561755894193 117% => OK
syllable_count: 558.0 506.74238477 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.492659391 49.4020404114 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 135.076923077 106.682146367 127% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.4615384615 20.7667163134 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.15384615385 7.06120827912 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.147600389324 0.244688304435 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0469218326466 0.084324248473 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0350155856637 0.0667982634062 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0877926884112 0.151304729494 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0210538427222 0.056905535591 37% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.4 13.0946893788 133% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 31.21 50.2224549098 62% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.42 12.4159519038 132% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.83 8.58950901804 126% => OK
difficult_words: 117.0 78.4519038076 149% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.