Practice and proposal for online arbitration as a dispute resolution bias in Vietnam
III. Practice and proposal for online arbitration as a dispute resolution bias in Vietnam
1. Practical application of online arbitration model in Vietnam
Currently, the online arbitration model is not well-developed in Vietnam. The Online Dispute Resolution System (ODR) of the Hanoi International Arbitration Center (HIAC) was the first ODR system in Vietnam. HIAC was established on April 18, 2019; after more than one year of establishment, HIAC has just put into operation the online dispute resolution system at www.hiac.vn.
The system provides solutions for identity authentication, information confidentiality, and direct interaction, allowing the parties to resolve disputes online at a convenient time selected by the parties. The disputes resolved on this system include disputes arising from online transactions and disputes arising in the real environment.
2. Some advantages of applying online arbitration model in Vietnam
First, ICT infrastructure meets the requirements of online arbitration.
ICT infrastructure in Vietnam, such as computers, telecommunications network equipment, telecommunications, and internet services, has been increasingly focused on investment and development. Network providers deploy using IPv6 to serve the needs of 4G LTE services... This contributes significantly to the speedy development of services and applications on the network, especially for online transactions.
Second, online arbitration is highly applicable.
Online arbitration has many internal characteristics such as flexibility, transparency, information control, eliminating national border barriers, strengthening neutrality, and cutting costs when resolving disputes. The traits mentioned above may attract businesses and agencies to adopt OA. Besides, businesses use OA to build trust with customers when ready to make transaction information transparent, care, and resolve questions. Simultaneously, matters such as jurisdiction of the court, applicable law, and actual location of dispute settlement will be resolved in the online space.
Third, the OA offloads the handling of disputes to the court system.
In Vietnam, the court system is always faced with overload and consists of many complicated procedures, so OA appears as an alternative. The impact of OA will be even more viable for cross-border e-commerce transactions.
Fourth, OA contributes to the development of Vietnam's economy.
In terms of the pure economy, the internet creates the potentials for Vietnam to grow rapidly and quickly integrate into the world economy. OA fosters confidence in e-commerce, which will increase e-commerce activities, and growth in the digital economy will expand. The growth of the digital economy will directly impact the development of the economy in general. From that perspective, OA is an important aspect that can help promote Vietnam's economy.
3. Difficulties in applying online arbitration model in Vietnam
First, Vietnamese culture is a barrier to OA.
Vietnamese people are often afraid to participate in disputes and often pay little attention to enterprises' responsibilities, so when there is a problem with product dissatisfaction, Vietnamese people often do not initiate a lawsuit.
Second, Vietnamese enterprises are not ready to use the OA model.
Currently, many businesses feel distrustful of using the OA model. They think that this is a new model, not yet guaranteed in Vietnam, so they do not want to use it. On the other hand, procedural rules are a new point that Vietnamese businesses have never contacted. Besides, the necessary infrastructure, such as the stable power supply and the roads allowing for mail delivery and the stable quality of the mobile internet infrastructure in Vietnam, is uneven.
Third, the knowledge and skills of the arbitration centers on ICT in Vietnam are limited.
Arbitration centers wishing to operate an online arbitration system need to meet technical infrastructure requirements, a team of technicians to support OA activities. Since then, many arbitration centers have not been able to resolve disputes with customers through online arbitration.
4. Some recommendations
First, the arbitration centers need to be a pioneer in the application of OA in their operations. In order to be able to resolve disputes with a significant online arbitration model, the centers need to equip themselves with legal knowledge and technological infrastructure altogether; Building OA system from simple with social support and gradually moving towards automation, building a team of technicians, in addition to the Vietnamese language, it is necessary to invest in popular international languages such as Vietnamese, UK, France, Spain,... to enter the online dispute resolution system. At the same time, the arbitrator should proactively approach and learn about the OA.
Second, the State needs to promulgate laws to implement, guide step by step to solve legal problems raised when applying OA, thereby building trust for the parties. These provisions are not meant to negate the traditional dispute settlement mechanism but a supplement, open up many ways for the parties to choose, suitable to each dispute's characteristics.
Third, internet service providers need to synchronize ICT infrastructure across regions across the country, creating conditions for businesses and consumers to access the internet not only on computers but also on mobile devices. Thus, in Vietnam, in the context of rapidly developing e-commerce, which leads to heightened disputes and complaints, OA can be seen as the future for dispute resolution.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 22, column 23, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ne arbitration. 4. Some recommendations First, the arbitration centers need to b...
^^^
Line 23, column 549, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , .
...es such as Vietnamese, UK, France, Spain,... to enter the online dispute resolutio...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, if, may, second, so, then, third, thus, well, in addition, in general, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 7.0 329% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 1.00243902439 1297% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 25.0 6.8 368% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 10.0 3.15609756098 317% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 14.0 5.60731707317 250% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 115.0 33.7804878049 340% => Less preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 49.0 3.97073170732 1234% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 4802.0 965.302439024 497% => Less number of characters wanted.
No of words: 827.0 196.424390244 421% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.80652962515 4.92477711251 118% => OK
Fourth root words length: 5.36261202112 3.73543355544 144% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.39420945819 2.65546596893 128% => OK
Unique words: 382.0 106.607317073 358% => Less unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.461910519952 0.547539520022 84% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 1505.7 283.868780488 530% => syllable counts are too long.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.45097560976 124% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 17.0 4.33902439024 392% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 6.0 0.482926829268 1242% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 12.0 3.36585365854 357% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 41.0 8.94146341463 459% => Too many sentences.
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 70.7679217636 43.030603864 164% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.12195122 112.824112599 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1707317073 22.9334400587 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.0243902439 5.23603664747 58% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 24.0 3.83414634146 626% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 18.0 3.70975609756 485% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 15.0 1.13902439024 1317% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.420653702969 0.215688989381 195% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.114027865784 0.103423049105 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.162175517782 0.0843802449381 192% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.155799263896 0.15604864568 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.181713613452 0.0819641961636 222% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 13.2329268293 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 61.2550243902 56% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 10.3012195122 131% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.42 11.4140731707 144% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.96 8.06136585366 111% => OK
difficult_words: 227.0 40.7170731707 558% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.