Increasing petrol price is the best way to solve traffic and pollution problems
Air pollution and traffic congestion are the two major concerns all around the world, and there is no palpable solution for the same. Some experts often argue that a surge in petrol prices may solve both of these problems. Nonetheless, this is only a short-term plan because there are no vital options available to run vehicles, also authorities should take some tangible solutions such as improving public transport.
On one hand, many essential commodities such as food and clothing are also dependent on gasoline, as all of them require heavy machinery which mostly operates via petrol and also it requires transportation from the manufacturer to the consumer site. Thus, a surge in gasoline prices would highly affect commodity prices. Moreover, it would be hard for families to enjoy their leisure time.
First and foremost, the local governments should decide on something long term. For instance, public transport should be accessible for everyone, and they should invest more in improving it such as making an underground transportation system and electric metros. Secondly, scientists should spend more time investing in renewable resources such as nuclear, wind, and solar power. Furthermore, it could decrease the buses and train fare, so eventually, everyone would be able to afford it. Thirdly, the administration can restrict the number of vehicles per family, it could drastically reduce traffic congestion. Last but not the least, the metropolitan city of Delhi has made an odd-even rule in this private vehicle number ending with an odd digit can travel only on odd days a month and number ending with even on even days.
To conclude, considering the aforementioned points, the solution of increasing the pricing in gasoline fall behind other everlasting solutions. The authorities should focus more on refining public transport and finding out a tangible solutions for other renewable resources.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-07 | nhub2409785 | 73 | view |
| 2024-10-07 | Tuan Harry | 89 | view |
| 2024-09-30 | Lethanh54 | 73 | view |
| 2024-09-28 | Trần Ánh Vy | 73 | view |
| 2024-09-18 | wholemilk | 78 | view |
- Some people think that mobile phones are harmful for children while other disagree 78
- Directors and managers of organisations are often older people Some people say that it is better for younger people to be leaders To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
- why do people prefer supermarkets over local shops 61
- Increasing petrol price is the best way to solve traffic and pollution problems 89
- Some people say that teenagers should work part time and earn money This way they will learn basic lessons about work and become more disciplined Others argue that teenagers shouldn t sacrifice their rest and after school activities to work Discuss both v 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 235, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'solution'?
Suggestion: solution
...ic transport and finding out a tangible solutions for other renewable resources.
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, may, moreover, nonetheless, second, secondly, so, third, thirdly, thus, for instance, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 41.998997996 69% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1624.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 301.0 315.596192385 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.39534883721 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16525528304 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86134281432 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 192.0 176.041082164 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.637873754153 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 507.6 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.6586432926 49.4020404114 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.0 106.682146367 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.85714285714 7.06120827912 125% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.10039848118 0.244688304435 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0363609418026 0.084324248473 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0516467775784 0.0667982634062 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0651814055111 0.151304729494 43% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0438093343695 0.056905535591 77% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.0946893788 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.04 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.29 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 78.4519038076 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.