Successful people try new thing and take risks rather than doing what they already how to do well.
Choosing what to do nowadays in important decisions is of great importance since it affects our lives in the long run. In my opinion, it is necessary to take new risks and try new methods in order to be prosperous. This is due to the fact that taking risks will open new solutions to us and it will stimulate our innovation.
To begin with, it is undeniable that in today’s hectic life, people may face new challenges and problems every day. Not all the situations that people confront are the same for different people. Therefore, I believe that it is better to try new methods in order to solve problems and to take risks to find a solution that is suitable for us and our situation. My personal experience is a compelling example of this. A few years ago, I took my university exam in order to be accepted to the university. After the announcement of the results of the university entrance exam, I remember that I filled a couple of the choices that I thought I might be accepted to in the application form. Eventually, after the final results were announced, I was not very satisfied with the results. However, I had the chance to change my major, but the university told me that it is almost impossible to do that. However, I tried my best and took risks, and started to change my major in the university. After about one year I was able to change my major and I was very content to do so. Based on this example, I strongly feel that people should take risks and try new methods.
Secondly, trying new methods will probably stimulate our innovation and leads to better prosperity in life. Sometimes people know to do something well, but the new problem that they have faced is somehow completely different from the situation that they have faced before, as a result the solution completely differs. Using what we know to do well in all the situations may cause some problems and not fit into new problems and situations. For example, I remember that I had a problem that I have never faced in my life before. I was really short of money in such a way that I could not afford to buy food. I did not want to borrow money from my family; therefore, I came to the conclusion that I must do something in order not to be short of money the next month. Thus, I started to open a Twitter account and to post funny and interesting posts on that account. After a while, people visited my account and followed me on that page and I could make some money from that. Since it was both interesting and in my field of expertise, I could easily solve my problem of lacking money. Had I not opened that Twitter account, I would have been short of money and would have faced many other problems.
In conclusion, I am strongly of the belief that people should try new methods and take risks in their life in order to be successful. This is because taking risks will help people find a suitable solution for their specific situation and it will arise our innovation to better solve the problem.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-11-18 | hadi.katooli | 73 | view |
| 2018-08-14 | Rayan65 | 78 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 293, Rule ID: ADMIT_ENJOY_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the gerund form: 'risks finding'.
Suggestion: risks finding
... in order to solve problems and to take risks to find a solution that is suitable for us and ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, may, really, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, well, while, for example, in conclusion, as a result, in my opinion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 15.1003584229 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 9.8082437276 163% => OK
Conjunction : 22.0 13.8261648746 159% => OK
Relative clauses : 21.0 11.0286738351 190% => OK
Pronoun: 85.0 43.0788530466 197% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 76.0 52.1666666667 146% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.0752688172 173% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2448.0 1977.66487455 124% => OK
No of words: 547.0 407.700716846 134% => OK
Chars per words: 4.47531992687 4.8611393121 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.83611736076 4.48103885553 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5594071559 2.67179642975 96% => OK
Unique words: 227.0 212.727598566 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.414990859232 0.524837075471 79% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 785.7 618.680645161 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 20.0 9.59856630824 208% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 26.0 20.6003584229 126% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.8603511577 48.9658058833 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.1538461538 100.406767564 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0384615385 20.6045352989 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.84615384615 5.45110844103 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.85842293907 207% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.237338199789 0.236089414692 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0677621067329 0.076458572812 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0674106914628 0.0737576698707 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.168858899653 0.150856017488 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0326352873075 0.0645574589148 51% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.2 11.7677419355 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 58.1214874552 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.1575268817 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.7 10.9000537634 80% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.3 8.01818996416 91% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 86.8835125448 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.