Knowledge to some extent and in a sense is said to be power. This proves itself in the arena of university setting whereby, varieties of courses are offered for the benefit of the students. The stimuli averts that universities should promote the idea of student taken courses that outside of their specific areas of interest. I most likely agree to the above statement because of three reasons.
First of all, it may affect the GPA of a student negatively. For example, in the university I attend, we had a science student who was a first class student right from his first year. But, unfortunately for him, when the new policy set up by the school came up for students who are in different departments compel to take compulsory courses from those departments, it was a massive failure for the medical student because throughout his studies he had never encountered other course. Given such a situation it became the root to the failure of this brilliant medical students. Hence, the school had to intervene because, it was going to worst that the boy, and the school fear that the boy may ended have pass as a grade. So, the school helped out and granted permission for the student to stick to his field.
Secondly, students in some sense could be versatile. For, instance studying philosophy has given me the opportunity to encounter other courses like: psychology, sociology, anthropology and others. With such an added advantage, I can stand anywhere or whenever I am called upon to speak in different area that is not my field I could at least engage in a discussion without being left behind. Therefore, in this sense, the idea of studying other courses shows itself as something helpful and beneficial. So, to this end the idea of university enforcing taking courses from other areas could be said to be helpful in sense.
Thirdly different students have area of strengths and weakness when it comes offering courses. On the other hand, it is quite important to have students have themselves engaged in other courses; but let us not forget the fact that as students people have their own strength and weaknesses. Hence, it is nice to put such into consideration when making such a decision because what is good for A may not be good for B. As a result to avoid having students making a clash and misplacing their priority should be avoided.
To conclude, I therefore most likely agree with the idea that university students should take different courses because of the above reasons. More so, there is need to avoid having poor grades by students as result of offering different course, students are enriched with knowledge in different areas, and also having in mind about differences when it comes to academic performances by different students.
- Some students prefer to study alone Others prefer to study with a group of students Which do you prefer Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement When people succeed it is entirely because of hard work Luck has nothing to do with their success Use specific reasons and examples to explain your position 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement When people succeed it is entirely because of hard work Luck has nothing to do with their success Use specific reasons and examples to explain your position 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement People today spend too much time on personal enjoyment and not enough time on more serious duties and obligations Use details and examples to support your answer 85
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Attending a live performance is more enjoyable than watching the same event on television 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 203, Rule ID: AGREEMENT_SENT_START[1]
Message: You should probably use 'avert'.
Suggestion: avert
...he benefit of the students. The stimuli averts that universities should promote the id...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, if, may, second, secondly, so, therefore, third, thirdly, at least, for example, of course, as a result, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 19.5258426966 97% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 12.4196629213 89% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 14.8657303371 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.3162921348 115% => OK
Pronoun: 41.0 33.0505617978 124% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 70.0 58.6224719101 119% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 12.9106741573 39% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2297.0 2235.4752809 103% => OK
No of words: 470.0 442.535393258 106% => OK
Chars per words: 4.88723404255 5.05705443957 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.65612321451 4.55969084622 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65973531429 2.79657885939 95% => OK
Unique words: 230.0 215.323595506 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.489361702128 0.4932671777 99% => OK
syllable_count: 721.8 704.065955056 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 6.24550561798 160% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.2370786517 104% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 62.028411309 60.3974514979 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.380952381 118.986275619 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.380952381 23.4991977007 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.66666666667 5.21951772744 147% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.2758426966 117% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.220329479711 0.243740707755 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0750590400597 0.0831039109588 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.047186004084 0.0758088955206 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.135605050944 0.150359130593 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0289907535602 0.0667264976115 43% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 14.1392134831 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 48.8420337079 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.1743820225 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.38 12.1639044944 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.85 8.38706741573 94% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 100.480337079 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 62.5 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.75 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.