Write an essay of at least 350 words to state your viewpoint on the following question.
With the development of artificial intelligence, modern robots have carried out more and more jobs in various areas. It is thought that they should be used to replace teachers in schools. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
When the development of artificial intelligence comes into view, it has always been a controversy topic. Thanks to the development of artificial intelligence, jobs in various fields have been carried out by modern robots. Some people think that they should replace teachers in schools. From my perspective, I disagree with this view for these following reasons.
In the first place, it is of vital significance to point out reasons that bring disagreement. The first worth mentioning reason might be the lack of realistic interaction once replacing teachers by robots. Robots and students will experience a formal interaction being similar to working with computers, which means they only provide students with knowledge but no realistic skills, especially communicate skill. This can either affect badly to the students’quality of gaining knowledge or the result of studying. The second reason that should not be ignored is that replacing teachers by robots costs an enormous amount of money. Robots are made from artificial intelligence, which means modern stuffs involved in several stages. No sooner are all teachers from schools being replaced than the country run out of money for other requirements of society. Last but not least, the third important reason might be the shortage of experience. Robots can have wide range of knowledge thanks to the development of artificial intelligence; however, they have no experience in teaching or dealing with students especially emotionally related ones. Students need passion, dedication and inspiration from their teachers to shape their attitude and behaviour towards their life. Briefly, replacing teachers by robots is a waste of money and quite ineffective.
In contrast, there are existing points that bring agreement too. One of the most important point is that robots have such a wide range of knowledge that students can even learn the basis of emotion theorically. Furthermore, thanks to the advanced technology, students will no longer have to deal with unusual questions that can’t be explained by teachers. This makes their ways of gaining knowledge become smoothly and less distracting.
In conclusion, it is my firm belief that replacing teachers by robots is a bad idea, which can bring one advantage but trigger hundred of problems not only to children but also the society. Perhaps, robots are more likely to replace other jobs such as workers or engineers due to their “amazing brain” rather than replace the teachers.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-11-28 | CCphuonguyen | 87 | view |
- Describe the statistics in this bar chart about sports participation by gender 67
- Describe the statistics in this bar chart of sports participation by gender 67
- There are many competitions organized for school students every year It is believed that taking part in these competitions benefits teenagers a lot To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
- This graph shows that there is an equal amount of participation in women s sports compared to men and we still can t have equality in sports 73
- The table below gives information about languages with the most native speakers Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 742, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'is'.
Suggestion: is
...s involved in several stages. No sooner are all teachers from schools being replace...
^^^
Line 7, column 128, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a hundred'.
Suggestion: a hundred
...ich can bring one advantage but trigger hundred of problems not only to children but al...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, briefly, but, first, furthermore, however, if, second, so, third, in conclusion, in contrast, such as, in the first place
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 41.998997996 129% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 8.3376753507 216% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2113.0 1615.20841683 131% => OK
No of words: 391.0 315.596192385 124% => OK
Chars per words: 5.40409207161 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.44676510885 4.20363070211 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89787088963 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 204.0 176.041082164 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.521739130435 0.561755894193 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 631.8 506.74238477 125% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 16.0721442886 131% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.1065205502 49.4020404114 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.619047619 106.682146367 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.619047619 20.7667163134 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.04761904762 7.06120827912 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.246112616389 0.244688304435 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0717282956066 0.084324248473 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0570035569909 0.0667982634062 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.148794724247 0.151304729494 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0626796364325 0.056905535591 110% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.04 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.33 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 78.4519038076 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.