The given a bar graph illustrates the information about the how frequency masses in the USA ate in fast food hotel during 10 years of time spend started from 2003.
Overall, it can be seen that, from 2003 to 2013 the percentage of people was never eaten fast food and people had been eating fast food which was decreased both as compared to other time periods.
As can be from seen that, in year 2003 and 2013 US person had eaten fast food in during the time period of the several time of the week, which percentage was approximately 70% and 60%, respectively, when in 2006, the proportion of people had eaten fast food increased almost by 3% and 4% as compared to the year 2003 and 2013. Secondly, the percentage of people who have once a week eaten of fast food from 2003 and 2030 it was nearly 30%, 33% and 26% respectively.
Furthermore, same number of people fast food in a few times a year, it was 15%, but in 2003 the lowest ratio of eating fast food by US people than in year 2006 and 2013.
- The first chart below shows how energy is used in an average Australian household The second chart shows the greenhouse gas emissions which result from this energy use 67
- The chart below shows the percentage of households in owned and rented accommodation in England and Wales between 1918 and 2011 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The chart shows how frequently people in the USA ate fast food in restaurants between 2003 and 2013 44
- More and more students are choosing to study at colleges and universities in a foreign country Do the benefits of studying abroad outweigh the drawbacks 89
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activity in 2010 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 57, Rule ID: THE_HOW[1]
Message: Did you mean 'how'?
Suggestion: how
...graph illustrates the information about the how frequency masses in the USA ate in fast...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 112, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun time seems to be countable; consider using: 'several times'.
Suggestion: several times
...t food in during the time period of the several time of the week, which percentage was appro...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, second, secondly, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 851.0 965.302439024 88% => OK
No of words: 170.0 196.424390244 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.00588235294 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.61087313685 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.35441144235 2.65546596893 126% => OK
Unique words: 102.0 106.607317073 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.6 0.547539520022 110% => OK
syllable_count: 229.5 283.868780488 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 5.0 8.94146341463 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 34.0 22.4926829268 151% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 69.4175770248 43.030603864 161% => OK
Chars per sentence: 170.2 112.824112599 151% => OK
Words per sentence: 34.0 22.9334400587 148% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.6 5.23603664747 145% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.324291120615 0.215688989381 150% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.210143754792 0.103423049105 203% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0355105587668 0.0843802449381 42% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.229827165705 0.15604864568 147% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0145817968653 0.0819641961636 18% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.2 13.2329268293 145% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.89 61.2550243902 88% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.3012195122 138% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.37 11.4140731707 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.39 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 19.5 11.4329268293 171% => OK
gunning_fog: 15.6 10.9970731707 142% => OK
text_standard: 20.0 11.0658536585 181% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.