Face to face conversation is better than other type of conversation such as telephone, internet , e mail etc. Agree or disagree
With the advancement of technology life of humans has converted into convenient lifestyle in such way that despite being in other corner of the world, people can stell be in touch with their near and dear ones. However, a school of thoughts advocate that traditional way of having conversation is better than communicating through online modes. I highly agree with this notion my proper justification will justifly in following paragraphs.
In the inception, there are myraid reasons in the favour of using old way of interacting one of them is ease in judging other with gesticulations. With the help of body language, intention of people can be easily realised. To examplify, whether being agressive , blusing or regretful, words are not required ; instead facial expressions describe everything. In order to stronger the bonding among people, face to face conversation plays an indispensable role and can be considered as second significant cause behind interacting in person . In this way people feel more close to each other which can build their relationship more stonger and deeper conversation.
Apart from this, even though, masses can easily intract with others through online ways regardless of the location. In oder to get quick response, traditional way is convenient responders may take time to reply to e-mail or picking up the call, even they can ignore in the case they do not want to have conversation. However, they are always answerable when the intiator of the convertion is front of them. Lastly, chance of having better understanding between communicators are higher when they are at same place whereas there is a chance of poor network services if onli online modes are used for talking with others. That being the reason, it does not matter how many interviews a company takes of its candidates by using morden ways, then final interview always face to face for better understanding.
To recapitulate, although usage of technology triggered modes is increasing, people's first preference would always be traditional ways of having interacting in oder to get its immense benefits
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-12-06 | faisal vhora | 89 | view |
- The graph below shows population figures for India and China since the years 2000 and predicted population growth up to until 2050 84
- Some people prefer to rise children in the cities while other believe that children should be rise in the countryside Discuss both views and give your opinion 89
- Some think that one of the best ways to solve environmental problems is to increase the cost of fuels for cars and other vehicles do you agree or disagree with this Statement 55
- cutting down tree is real environment threat yes this is still happening at a great rate around the world why do you think forests are being destroyed are there benefits from the destruction of forest 84
- The chart below gives information about science qualifications held by In two countries
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 8, column 261, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d. To examplify, whether being agressive , blusing or regretful, words are not re...
^^
Line 8, column 262, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
.... To examplify, whether being agressive , blusing or regretful, words are not req...
^^
Line 8, column 539, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...icant cause behind interacting in person . In this way people feel more close to e...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, lastly, may, second, so, then, whereas, apart from
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 61.0 41.998997996 145% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1789.0 1615.20841683 111% => OK
No of words: 338.0 315.596192385 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.29289940828 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28774723029 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95590699437 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 209.0 176.041082164 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.618343195266 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 558.0 506.74238477 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.4272798559 49.4020404114 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.785714286 106.682146367 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.1428571429 20.7667163134 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 7.06120827912 71% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.145499853092 0.244688304435 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0466715240004 0.084324248473 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0550033239741 0.0667982634062 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0790250765674 0.151304729494 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0471233466054 0.056905535591 83% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 13.0946893788 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.7 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.31 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 78.4519038076 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.