tpo 36
The reading and the lecture are both about four-day week work. Whereas the author of the passage states that there are many advantages, if people started to work a four-day week, the lecturer suggests that a four-day week is not the best option. The speaker casts doubt on the main points in the text by providing three reasons.
First of all, according to the reading, the shortened workweek would increase company profits, for employees who will take this option. However, the speaker disputes this idea by saying that this option will force companies to expand, so businesses will end spending more money on activities such as training, computers, and more space for workers to work. Furthermore, he mentions that companies have to offer health insurance to all their employees whether if they are four-day or five-day week workers, affecting the companies' money.
Secondly, the passage states that one main advantage of offering this option is that this will help to reduce unemployment rates. Nevertheless, the speaker refutes this argument by saying that some companies will ask some of their employees who are working a four-day week to work extra hours. Besides, he points out that some companies are going to make their workers do the same amount of work that they used to do in a five-day week but now in a four-day week.
Finally, the text claims that a four-day workweek would be better for individual employees who are going to enjoy more free time. On the other hand, the lecturer believes that it is true they will probably have more free time but they will be running many risks. Since if the company decided to reduce their people, four-day workers are more probably to get fired.
In conclusion, although the reading and the audio are both about a four-day workweek, the three main points made in the text are effectively challenged by the lecturer.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2022-09-20 | HideAPumpkin | 75 | view |
2022-09-02 | Allenwlh | 70 | view |
2021-09-08 | whiteflower | 80 | view |
2021-08-17 | Mizanur | 40 | view |
2021-03-22 | alibenvari | 70 | view |
- Four day worked 60
- TPO 01 Integrated Writing next 19 51 HIDE TIME Directions You have 20 minutes to plan and write your response Your response will be judged on the basis of the quality of your writing and on how well your response presents the points in the lecture and the 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Teachers should not make their social or political views known to students in the classroom Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 71
- Although it s a new technology solar energy provides benefits to the entire world First solar energy eliminates our reliance on non renewable fossil fuels Additionally solar energy is non pollutant which makes it better for everyone Finally there is almos 75
- uestion Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Teachers should not make their social or political views known to students in the classroom Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 65
flaws:
No. of Words: 316 250
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Number of Paragraphs: 5 4
better to have 4 paragraphs:
para 1: introduction
para 2: doubt 1
para 3: doubt 2
para 4: doubt 3
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 22 in 30
Category: Satisfactory Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 3 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 3 2
No. of Sentences: 13 12
No. of Words: 316 250
No. of Characters: 1516 1200
No. of Different Words: 145 150
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.216 4.2
Average Word Length: 4.797 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.373 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 104 80
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 83 60
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 56 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 26 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 24.308 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 7.14 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.846 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.4 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.645 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.122 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 5 4