In contrast to the reading passage, which doubts the existing of bees 200 millions ago. The professor argues that it is possible for bees existing based on the following reasons.
The first point that makes by the professor is the absence of specific trees which produce sticky liquid 200 million years ago. To be more specific, the reason why there were no fossils of actual bees during that period is because there was no liquid which could preserve the body of bees. Furthermore, those trees became much more common 100 millions age.
Second, the author states that flowering plants were absent in that period while bees and flowering plants have mutually dependency. However, the professor contends that bees did not rely on flowers 200 million years age. In addition, they firstly relied on pine trees or other plants before flowers exist. Later, bees adapt flowers as their food source.
Finally, the professor refutes that the fossilized structures which lack of evidence that made by bees. She provides the chemical evidence that there are water proofing material found on the modern bee nests. Moreover, these materials appeared in the fossil of bee nests 200 million years ago.
In contrast to the reading passage, which doubts the existence of bees 200 millions ago. The professor argues that it is possible for bees existing based on the following reasons.
The first point that is made by the professor is the absence of specific trees which produce sticky liquid 200 million years ago. To be more specific, the reason why there were no fossils of actual bees during that period is because there was no liquid which could preserve the body of bees. Furthermore, those trees became much more common 100 millions years ago.
Second, the author states that flowering plants were absent in that period while bees and flowering plants have mutually dependency. However, the professor contends that bees did not rely on flowers 200 million years ago. In addition, they firstly relied on pine trees or other plants before flowers existed. Later, bees adapt flowers as their food source.
Finally, the professor refutes the fossilized structures which lack evidence that made by bees. She provides the chemical evidence that there is water proofing material found on the modern bee nests. Moreover, these materials appeared in the fossil of bee nests 200 million years ago.
- Claim Imagination is a more valuable asset than experience Reason People who lack experience are free to imagine what is possible without the constraints of established habits and attitudes Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agr 50
- Some people believe that when busy parents do not have a lot of time to spend with their children the best use of that time is to have fun playing games or sports Others believe that it is best to use that time doing things together that are related to sc 68
- Glass is a favored building material for modern architecture yet it is also very dangerous for wild birds Because they often cannot distinguish between glass and open air millions of birds are harmed every year when they try to fly through glass windows T 65
- the best way for a society to prepare its young people for leadership in government industry or other fields by instilling in them a sense of cooperation not competition 50
- The best way for a society to prepare its young people for leadership in government industry or other fields is by instilling in them a sense of cooperation not competition Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree wi 50
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, moreover, second, so, while, in addition, in contrast, in contrast to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.4613686534 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 5.04856512141 20% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 7.30242825607 27% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 22.412803532 62% => OK
Preposition: 19.0 30.3222958057 63% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1007.0 1373.03311258 73% => OK
No of words: 195.0 270.72406181 72% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.1641025641 5.08290768461 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.73687570622 4.04702891845 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.31199598697 2.5805825403 90% => OK
Unique words: 116.0 145.348785872 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.594871794872 0.540411800872 110% => OK
syllable_count: 297.0 419.366225166 71% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 6.0 8.23620309051 73% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 21.2450331126 75% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 28.8415209955 49.2860985944 59% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 83.9166666667 110.228320801 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.25 21.698381199 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.0 7.06452816374 142% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 4.33554083885 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.27373068433 187% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.469528729708 0.272083759551 173% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.181513349308 0.0996497079465 182% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.158442300162 0.0662205650399 239% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.313992237442 0.162205337803 194% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.216207478039 0.0443174109184 488% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 13.3589403974 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 53.8541721854 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 11.0289183223 76% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.35 12.2367328918 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.48 8.42419426049 101% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 63.6247240618 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.7273730684 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.498013245 80% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.