Many high-level positions in companies are filled by men even though the workforce in many developed countries is more than 50 percent female. Companies should be required to allocate a certain percentage of these positions to women. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Despite the fact that the female rate of employment is above 50 percent than that of men, men are more likely to be offered senior posts at several organisations. These people claim that a specific number of these positions should be offered to female personnel. This essay will argue why offering certain top positions to only women will only discourage hard-working traits among workers as promotion is generally only based on the potentiality of an employee and not on the basis of gender.
In the rising trend of equality among all genders, it would not be fair enough to hire any particular percentage of any gender for any top position. In other words, the selection criteria which is not based upon the effectiveness of an employee will contribute to support one sex over the other. Consequently, this would not discourage the capability of any worker and but his zeal to perform diligently would also be harnessed. For example, my brother’s business company was in good condition and was led by a female CEO for 5 years, after her job tenure, the same post was offered to some other female staff member who was not equally potential and had no prior knowledge. The company had to pay a huge loss just because it was promoting one gender, which clearly elucidates the scenario being discussed.
Apart from this, the determination of an employee will also be forsaken if top level positions will simply be offered to females just to motivate them. There are myriads of individuals, irrespective of their gender, who render dedication and commitment towards their organisation which is often remarkable. If their work is simply ignored for another gender’s sake, they would fail to work hard for the promotion of high-level positions. Over all, these kinds of practices should be overlooked as they only deteriorate the diligent nature of some people.
To conclude, this essay argued that people who are in favor of women being in senior positions in an organisation, certainly do not follow the concepts of equality between the sexes and the committed nature of the employee towards their his work. In my opinion, awarding those positions to only one gender will be erroneous as it is entirely unjustified despite favoring one gender with little or no commitment.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-12-09 | sameerlekhi | 73 | view |
| 2019-11-26 | GAU1312 | 91 | view |
- One of your friends invited you for a meal with his her family in their home You enjoyed the meal and had been happy to be introduced to his her family Write a letter to your friend In your letter thank your friend and say that you enjoyed the meal say wh 65
- In many cities an increasing number of people do not know their neighbours and the sense of community is lost Discuss the causes and give measures to turn it around Discuss both views and give your opinion 89
- Some people think that watching sports in one s free time is just a waste of time To what extent do you agree or disagree with the statement 56
- Due to the development and rapid expansion of supermarkets in some countries many small local businesses are unable to compete Some people think that the closure of local business will bring about the death of local communities To what extent do you agree 78
- Multinational companies are becoming increasingly common in developing countries What are the advantages and disadvantages of this 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 6, column 295, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...owards their organisation which is often remarkable. If their work is simply igno...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, if, look, so, apart from, for example, in my opinion, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 13.1623246493 182% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 41.998997996 129% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1907.0 1615.20841683 118% => OK
No of words: 380.0 315.596192385 120% => OK
Chars per words: 5.01842105263 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.41515443553 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77999755874 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 207.0 176.041082164 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.544736842105 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 615.6 506.74238477 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 20.2975951904 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 44.9085238034 49.4020404114 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 136.214285714 106.682146367 128% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.1428571429 20.7667163134 131% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.64285714286 7.06120827912 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.18453760297 0.244688304435 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.068233605115 0.084324248473 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0552764025137 0.0667982634062 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.121437483195 0.151304729494 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.051865298198 0.056905535591 91% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.07 50.2224549098 88% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 12.4159519038 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.72 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 78.4519038076 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.1190380762 126% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.