The diagram compares the number of Britain part-time and full-time students in higher education in three periods, classified by their gender. Overall, full-time scholars were significantly outnumbered by part-time ones and among those people who chose to study part-time, there were more men than women in two out of three periods.
To begin with, part-time enrollment witnessed an upward trend in the number of female students over the time frame, while the number of male students followed an unstable pattern. Indeed, there were 1000 male scholars during 1970-1971 but after 10 years, this figure slipped to about 850, following by a slight increase in the next period and stood at around 900. In contrast, the number of female scholars started at 700 then gradually climbed up to 800 in 10-year period and finally landed at 1100.
In addition, over the periods, more men and women chose to enrol in full-time education, from nearly 100 thousand men and 50 thousand women in 1970/71 to approximately double the number of men and quadruple the number of women after 20 years.
- Claim While boredom is often expressed with a sense of self satisfaction it should really be a source of embarrassment Reason Boredom arises from a lack of imagination and self motivation 86
- Artificial intelligence will soon replace teachers in the classroom Do you agree with this statement What is an alternative to traditional face to face teaching 73
- Alternative forms of transport should be encouraged and international laws introduced to control car ownership and use What are your views 73
- The diagram below shows one way of manufacturing ceramic pots 84
- The chart below shows the number of men and women in thousand in further education in Britain in three periods and whether they were studying full time or part time 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, if, then, while, in addition, in contrast, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 906.0 965.302439024 94% => OK
No of words: 178.0 196.424390244 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.08988764045 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.65262427087 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55901188953 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 106.0 106.607317073 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.595505617978 0.547539520022 109% => OK
syllable_count: 265.5 283.868780488 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 22.4926829268 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 35.0602655755 43.030603864 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 151.0 112.824112599 134% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.6666666667 22.9334400587 129% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.6666666667 5.23603664747 223% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.426753542866 0.215688989381 198% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.20479243507 0.103423049105 198% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.129212984702 0.0843802449381 153% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.289178923091 0.15604864568 185% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.129035984455 0.0819641961636 157% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.4 13.2329268293 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.5 61.2550243902 82% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.3012195122 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.83 11.4140731707 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.36 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.9970731707 124% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.