Some people prefer to travel alone; other people choose to join a tour group, which do you like and why?
Traveling is one of the most preferable activities that people around the world do, however, ever there are loads of controversial heated debate around it. In this connection, opinions are divided into whether social members had better travel alone or join a tour group. Personally, it is my firm conviction that going to travel with a group is far more beneficial. Stating in the ensuing paragraphs, I will elaborate on my standpoint for two conspicuous reasons.
The first worthwhile reason to support my stance is that traveling with a tour group is way economical rather than traveling alone. To be more specific, we will pay for everything less so it will cost us less money. My personal experience of turkey travel is a compelling clarification on this. Two years before now, I went to Van in Turkey with a tour group. Since we went everywhere to visit we got discount on any expenses; for example, we went to Van Castle where is one of the most historical places I had ever visited before that the price of a ticket for everyone was 10 dollars, although it cast 8 dollars per person just because we were a group. Therefore, it is crystal clear that traveling with a group is much more economical.
The second remarkable point to clarify my outlook is that traveling with a group serves us with creating more opportunities to find someone else who is more like to us as a good friend. Indeed, having common interests are critical to have a long-term friendship and it is utterly obvious that finding someone with similar habits in traveling with a group is more possible rather than traveling alone. My own experience as the one who used to travel alone is an apt illustration of this. As an introverted person, I would always get away from people and travel lonely as a result, I had just a few friends. Accidentally, I led 6 years ago a group of foregoing tourists who did not familiar with the region; as a consequence, I realized that how it is easy to make friends and build connections with other people when we travel in a group even the ones who we have never seen them. As a result, back then, I barely travel alone unless I have to since traveling with a group is a practical way to make more friends.
To wrap up what has been discussed, I profoundly reckon that traveling with a group has more pluses. I feel this way because it is more affordable due to its advantage of getting a discount of visiting everywhere as a group. Besides, traveling with groups helps us with providing the chance to have more interaction with others and making friends.
- The Mediterranean island of Malta is home to a puzzling archaeological site that consists of a collection of pairs of parallel lines or grooves carved into the rock of the ground These grooves thought to be at least a few thousand years old can be quite l 90
- The production of electricity in nuclear power plants generates radioactive waste as a by product The waste is often placed in canisters containers but it remains radioactive for thousands of years emitting invisible radiation that is harmful to humans an 90
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is important to know about events that are happening around the world 76
- The ability to maintain id a friendship with a few people is more important for happiness than the ability to make new friends easily Do you agree or disagree 70
- In recent years wind energy as a source of renewable and clear energy has become increasingly popular Unfortunately wind energy has one significant environmental drawback fast moving turbine blades pose serious threats to birds flying through wind farms V 90
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, first, however, if, look, second, so, then, therefore, while, for example, i feel, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 15.1003584229 159% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 9.8082437276 41% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 13.8261648746 36% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.0286738351 136% => OK
Pronoun: 51.0 43.0788530466 118% => OK
Preposition: 59.0 52.1666666667 113% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2113.0 1977.66487455 107% => OK
No of words: 457.0 407.700716846 112% => OK
Chars per words: 4.62363238512 4.8611393121 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.62358717085 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74386906958 2.67179642975 103% => OK
Unique words: 229.0 212.727598566 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.501094091904 0.524837075471 95% => OK
syllable_count: 679.5 618.680645161 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 15.0 9.59856630824 156% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.1344086022 119% => OK
Sentence length SD: 62.8536091031 48.9658058833 128% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.210526316 100.406767564 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0526315789 20.6045352989 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.42105263158 5.45110844103 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.220556210596 0.236089414692 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0804996024923 0.076458572812 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0483927883556 0.0737576698707 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.149893526685 0.150856017488 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.056191023847 0.0645574589148 87% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 11.7677419355 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 58.1214874552 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.81 10.9000537634 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.94 8.01818996416 99% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 86.8835125448 104% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.002688172 115% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.0537634409 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.