Imagine that you are going to visit a new city, which one of
the following ways do you think is the best way to know the
city in a short time?
Visit historic sites
Go to shops and markets
Enjoy the restaurant and spend time in cafe
Nowadays, people's inclination toward visiting different cities and countries has increased and, although they have hectic daily schedules, they are interested in being familiar with different cities. There are three ways in order to get familiar with a new city during a limited time: visiting historic sites, going to shops and markets in that ciry, or spending time in their restaurants and cafes. When it comes to me, it is my firm conviction that the latter option, enjoing the local restaurant, can be considred as the better approach. To support this, there are several reasons, two of which are going to be aptly explored in the the following.
First and foremost, the most prominent reason which comes to my mind is that by going to the local restaurants and spending time in them, ones is provided with a oppotunity to socialize with local people who are presented there. Generaly speaking, one of the most practical way in order to get familiar with a certain place is to contact with its local people. Needless to say, by spending time in a cafe, people not only will be able to socialize and increase their knowledge about that city, but also could enjoy the convivial atmosphere provided for them in those places. For example, a couple of years ago, I traveled to a near city of my own twon,although I was interested in getting familiar with that city, I was in rush to return to my home. So, I decided to spend my remain time in a local restaurant, by that I started discussion with some local people in restaurant during my lunch time and that discussion was very beneficial for me to get information about that city in limited time.
Furthermore, another noteworthy reason that should be taken into account is that in local restaurant visitors are provided with the golden chance to taste the cousine. It goes without saying that, people in each place have their specific recipe for foods which in most cases is the direct result of their culture. Moreover, some local food have a history which is regarded to their ritual in the past. As a result, by attending to a restaurant in a certain city, people will be able to gain information about the culture of that city and this approach does not take much time to be done. At the end of the day, a visitor with limited time not only gets familiar with that city, but also enjoys a diffirent taste of a delicious food.
In short, all the aforementioned reasons lead us to the conclusion that, the most practical approach for getting information about a city in limited time, is to spend time in its restaurants. The fact that they will be able to gain first-hand experience by establishing rapport with local people in there, coupled with gainin practical information about their culture by trying their foods, is the reason which strengthens my claim.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-01-05 | Maedeee | 73 | view |
| 2020-11-17 | Maziyeh Khavari1390 | 90 | view |
| 2020-11-17 | Maziyeh Khavari1390 | 76 | view |
| 2020-11-17 | Maziyeh Khavari1390 | 70 | view |
| 2020-11-17 | Maziyeh Khavari1390 | 70 | view |
- Communal online encyclopedias represent one of the latest resources to be found on the Internet They are in many respects like traditional printed encyclopedias collections of articles on various subjects What is specific to these online encyclopedias how 80
- Humans have long been fascinated by elephants the largest land animal in the modern world Social animals that live in herds elephants are native to both Africa and Asia Their large ears long trunk and long life span have made elephants one of the most cap 80
- The government wants to invest money to develop open space Do you think it is better to build a park to provide entertainment for everyone or to build a sports ground for a high school without a sports field 73
- The sea otter is a small mammal that lives in waters along the western coast of North America from California to Alaska When some sea otter populations off the Alaskan coast started rapidly declining a few years ago it caused much concern because sea otte 81
- Glass is a favored building material for modern architecture yet it is also very dangerous for wild birds Because they often cannot distinguish between glass and open air millions of birds are harmed every year when they try to fly through glass windows T 83
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 633, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: the
...which are going to be aptly explored in the the following. First and foremost, the mos...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 633, Rule ID: DT_DT[1]
Message: Maybe you need to remove one determiner so that only 'the' or 'the' is left.
Suggestion: the; the
...which are going to be aptly explored in the the following. First and foremost, the mos...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 161, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...ing time in them, ones is provided with a oppotunity to socialize with local peop...
^
Line 2, column 651, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , although
...I traveled to a near city of my own twon,although I was interested in getting familiar wi...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, if, moreover, so, then, for example, in short, as a result, in most cases
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 26.0 15.1003584229 172% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 22.0 11.0286738351 199% => OK
Pronoun: 50.0 43.0788530466 116% => OK
Preposition: 88.0 52.1666666667 169% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2330.0 1977.66487455 118% => OK
No of words: 490.0 407.700716846 120% => OK
Chars per words: 4.75510204082 4.8611393121 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.70488508055 4.48103885553 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61377824895 2.67179642975 98% => OK
Unique words: 225.0 212.727598566 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.459183673469 0.524837075471 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 734.4 618.680645161 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6003584229 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 30.0 20.1344086022 149% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 44.8704733093 48.9658058833 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 145.625 100.406767564 145% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.625 20.6045352989 149% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.5 5.45110844103 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.216243256246 0.236089414692 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0835904981602 0.076458572812 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0921207656126 0.0737576698707 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.150037238961 0.150856017488 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.070331153696 0.0645574589148 109% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.3 11.7677419355 139% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.49 58.1214874552 85% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.1575268817 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.92 10.9000537634 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.15 8.01818996416 102% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 86.8835125448 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 10.002688172 130% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.0537634409 139% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.247311828 137% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.